Search for: "Walker v. Martin"
Results 41 - 60
of 198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2015, 7:50 am
In the age of Google, this is a problem, which is why the plaintiff in this case sued various media companies for libel when the criminal charges against her were dropped.The case is Martin v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:28 am
It presents an issue related to the one in the pending case of Walker v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:29 am
Supreme Court will hear oral argument March 23 in the case of Walker v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 7:46 am
In Gjeka v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Martin decided yesterday by the Supreme Court builds upon Beard v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, and both sides have vowed to take Perry v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:19 am
Walker; Judge Martin argued that heightened scrutiny should apply because Mr. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 11:24 am
Judge Martin started her persuasive dissent like this:Maurice Walker was jailed by the City of Calhoun for six days because he was too poor to pay his bail. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:02 pm
In John Romans Park Homes Ltd v Hancock [2018] UKUT 249 (LC), Martin Rodger QC, Deputy President of the Upper Tribunal, made an interesting, tricky, but important distinction concerning the criteria for when a park provides security for a mobile home. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Louisiana Walker v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Kholi (09-868) and Walker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
Reinhard, and Walker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
(Martin J. concurring): “We would allow the appeal and order a new trial. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1148 (Korea Supply Co.); Kraus v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 7:33 pm
” [via LexisOne]\ Noncapital James Walker v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:53 am
To the extent plaintiff argues that defendants did not sufficiently emphasize his ownership in the 47BH account, the argument is unavailing, since an insufficient emphasis would be, "at most, a mere error in professional judgment not rising to the level of legal malpractice" (see Geller v Harris, 258 AD2d 421, 421 [1999]; Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467 [1998]). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 3:42 am
To the extent plaintiff argues that defendants did not sufficiently emphasize his ownership in the 47BH account, the argument is unavailing, since an insufficient emphasis would be, "at most, a mere error in professional judgment not rising to the level of legal malpractice" (see Geller v Harris, 258 AD2d 421, 421 [1999]; Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467 [1998]). [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:07 am
Martin, and Morgan State Univ. v. [read post]
