Search for: "v. Marshall et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2021, 9:37 pm
John Kilhallon, et al. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:34 am
Perry et al. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
See Brief for Amicus Curiae MacArthur Justice Center, et al. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
See Abbie Vansickle, You Can Get Kicked Off a Jury Pool for Supporting Black Lives Matter, The Marshall Project, July 7, 2020. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:43 am
Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991), but advised that its grant of authority for that particular deposition should not be considered precedent, and China has not permitted a deposition since. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:57 am
The Estate of James J Marshall v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:30 am
At Pizza Limited | Rat Pack / RatPac – Not All Trade Mark Judges are Movie Producers | UK patent exams update: Major changes to invigilation arrangements for candidates taking the exams in the office | UK patent exams update: Final version of FAQs released | When free-riding someone else's brand might be a win-win situation | [Guestpost]: IP implications of 3D printing, a new studyNever Too Late 279 [Week ending August 23] No CJEU reference (yet) as Mannheim… [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
NATIONAL MEDICAL IMAGING, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:13 am
Wise et al v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:15 pm
"Biden Inches Leftward on Immigration," Marshall Project, 9 July 2020 [text]"The Danger of America’s Coronavirus Immigration Bans," The Atlantic, 28 June 2020 [text]"The Immigration System is Set to Come to a Near Halt, and No One is Paying Attention," BuzzFeed News, 30 June 2020 [text]- Discusses funding for USCIS.More Americans Want to Increase Immigration Than Reduce It (CATO at Liberty, July 2020) [text]The Second Trump Asylum Ban Has Been Defeated in… [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
In a recent NBER report by David Altig et. al., researchers found that by earning an extra $1,000, one in four of the poorest households, regardless of age, gives half to two-thirds of their paycheck to the government in taxes due to marginal net tax rates above 70 percent on earned income.[1] This has significant implications for work incentives and tax credit eligibility if filers combine their incomes and continue working. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:46 pm
See Washington Banker’s Ass’n. et ano. v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
During day one of the hearing, the settlement of actor Kris Marshall was announced down, with NGN offering an apology and paying a six-figures sum in damages. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:26 am
The Court of Appeal is to hand down judgment in Arkin v Marshall at 1.30 pm on Monday (11 May). [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:17 am
Walmart, Inc., et al. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Marshall, 564 U.S. 462, 499 (2011). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:40 am
[A recently-filed cert petition gives the Court a good opportunity to rule on the constitutional role of presidential electors] A cert petition (available here) has been filed with the Supreme Court in the latest case involving "faithless electors," Chiafalo et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Or consider another example: in United States v. [read post]
