Search for: "Par, Inc." Results 641 - 660 of 1,126
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
Reddy's Laboratories, Inc.; Glenmark Generics Inc., USA; Glenmark Generics Ltd.; Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; Hetero USA Inc.; Hetero Labs Limited; Hetero Labs Limited Unit V; Hetero Drugs Ltd.; Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Mylan Inc.; Mylan Laboratories Limited; Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc.; Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.; Sun Pharma Global FZE; Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.; Sun Pharma Global… [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The most-consulted French-language decision was Financière Transcapitale inc. c. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:53 am by Administrator
The most-consulted French-language decision was Financière Transcapitale inc. c. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 4:05 am by Administrator
Enfin, à la lumière de Lac d’amiante du Québec ltée c. 2858-0702 Québec inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Boeing Canada Inc., [2000] O.J. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Importantly, the employee was the senior network administrator and the only engineer in the employer’s IT department at a time when it received a security posture “above par” in an audit conducted by an independent IT company. [read post]
25 May 2014, 4:05 am by Administrator
Intitulé : 9072-7892 Québec inc. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:12 am by Administrator
GFL Environmental Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:05 pm by Jarod Bona
So California is abuzz with recently released documents in an antitrust class action by employees against giant Silicon Valley employers like Google, Inc., Apple Inc., Intel Corp and Adobe Systems Inc. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Homburg Invest Inc. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Herjavec Group Inc., 2014 ONSC 2039 (CanLII), the reasonable period for an employee who had worked for only 51 weeks was found to be four months. . . . [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Teranet Inc. 2014 ONSC 1677[1] This is an appeal from the decision of Horkins J., dated December 14, 2012, denying a motion to certify a class proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992 c. 6 (“CPA”). [2] The Respondent manages Ontario’s electronic land registry system. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Times inc. qui, après avoir défini le consommateur moyen protégé par la L.p.c. comme étant un consommateur crédule et inexpérimenté, propose une analyse en deux étapes en tenant compte du sens littéral des mots employés par le fabricant : (1) décrire d’abord l’impression générale que la représentation est susceptible de donner chez le consommateur… [read post]