Search for: ""duty to warn""
Results 741 - 760
of 1,327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2017, 8:23 pm
A drug manufacturer has a duty to warn of known dangers. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:57 am
Where roadways have known faults or are under repairs, the state has a duty to warn motorists of the hazards and take reasonable steps to bring the roads into safe operating conditions. [read post]
4 May 2018, 9:22 am
However, the court also rejected this claim, finding that since the plaintiff assumed the risks involved in skiing off-trail, the resort did not owe him a duty to warn of the conditions. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 6:19 am
In a premises liability case, you will need to look at defendant’s duty to warn of known defects. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
The court noted that there is no duty to warn of an obvious condition, such as in this case. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm
In short, the Court ruled that while a manufacture has a duty to warn the user about the dangers of a product and how to avoid injury, it does not have a duty to train the user. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:50 am
On the merits, the court found that the plaintiff failed to establish that a shoulder dystocia occurred on her first delivery, thereby relieving the defendant of the duty to warn the plaintiff of any material risks or dangers regarding the delivery of her second child. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Drug manufacturers have a legal and ethical duty to warn patients about potential risks and to remove drugs from the market/not place them on the market if they are harmful. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:29 am
It is often hard to think that you were working with fatal substances and no one warned you. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:18 pm
In other words, property owners have a duty to warn visitors of known dangers that are hidden and to take reasonable precautions against dangers that are foreseeable. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 9:32 am
The court explained that a defendant generally does not have a duty to warn of open and obvious hazards. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:12 pm
Under the GTLA, a plaintiff making a premises liability claim must prove that “(1) the governmental entity owns and controls the location or instrumentality alleged to have caused the injury; (2) a dangerous, defective, or, in the case of sidewalks, unsafe condition caused the injury; (3) the governmental entity had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition; and (4) the governmental entity breached either its duty to eliminate the condition or its duty to… [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:55 pm
More Blog Posts: Maryland Court Examines a Manufacturer’s Duty to Warn Household Members in Asbestos Case, Maryland Personal Injury Blog, published June 2, 2017 Maryland Court Rules Asbestos Defendants May Be Liable for Failure to Warn About Replacement Parts, Maryland Personal Injury Blog, published March 19, 2016 The post Maryland Court of Appeals Holds Pipefitter May Sue Corporation Decades After Asbestos Exposure appeared first on Maryland Personal Injury Blog. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:12 am
The appellate court explained that although property owners are supposed to use reasonable care for those they invite onto the property, there isn’t a duty to warn against dangers that are actually known about or that are obvious. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 10:03 am
In addition, the court said the business had no duty to warn the woman about an obvious condition that she should have noticed. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 11:13 am
It is important to note that the landowner has no duty to warn the invitee of a danger that is obvious, reasonably apparent, or as well known to the person injured as it is to the landowner. [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:42 pm
The appellate court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the trial court’s refusal to submit the requested instruction to the jury was erroneous, noting that the trial court gave the jury an instruction that set forth a property owner’s duties, including the duty to warn of hidden defects. [read post]
6 May 2015, 2:21 pm
Every premises liability case analysis involving invitees begins here: “Generally, a property owner owes two duties to an invitee: (1) the duty to use reasonable care in maintaining the property in a reasonably safe condition; and (2) the duty to warn of latent or concealed dangers which are or should be known to the owner and which are unknown to the invitee and cannot be discovered through the exercise of due care. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 11:56 am
Was a safety monitor on duty to warn workers when they near the edge? [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:15 am
Of course, many prescription drugs come with less-than-desirable side-effects, and it is the manufacturer’s duty to warn patients of not just the likely side-effects, but all known possible side-effects. [read post]
