Search for: "DOES 1-19"
Results 741 - 760
of 19,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2021, 2:39 pm
People hired after September 1 must be vaccinated within 14 days. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 1:38 am
The Board carefully assessed the applicability of Art. 84 EPC as well as of Rule 42(1)(c) and Rule 48(1)(c) EPC as possible legal basis requiring adaptation of the description, and concluded that such basis does not exist (except possible in the case of non-unity). [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 1:53 pm
University Health Network[1], the Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently discontinued an interim injunction[2] that had been granted to provisionally preserve the employment status of a group of unionized and non-unionized employees who were subject to the potential termination of their employment for failing to comply with the employer’s mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:40 pm
When: Apr 1, 2020 03:00- 4:00 PM Central Time (US and Canada) Register in advance for this meeting: https://zoom.us/meeting/register/v5Irfu6prDoomHJNdraZeBHo2t_784DzvA After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:18 am
The debate address the relevance of Art.60(1) EPC (The right to a European patent shall belong to the inventor or his successor in title), Art.60(3) EPC (In proceedings before the European Patent Office, the applicant shall be deemed to be entitled to exercise the right to a European patent) and Rule 19(2) (The European Patent Office shall not verify the accuracy of the designation of the inventor) as well as Art. 81 first and second sentence (statement to the origin of… [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 9:54 pm
820 ILCS 305/19(f)(1). [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 7:00 am
For other COVID 19 related immigration updates please visit our Immigration and COVID-19 Resource Center here. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:39 pm
Germany, Austria and France have all recently taken action by mandating respiratory protection equivalent to N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) and higher quality masks for workers and members of the public and have recommended enhanced ventilation in indoor settings [1–3].The United States should take similar strong actions to control the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:05 am
This referral does not appear to be high on the EBA's priority list. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:56 pm
Chartier, No. 19-1681 (Iowa Sup. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization 20th Anniversary SymposiumMark Tushnet For quite a while I’ve been irritated by the aphorism that “it takes a Theory to beat a Theory” in constitutional law and interpretation.[1]It strikes me as the sort of false profundity that gets thrown around in first-year college dormitories. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 12:12 pm
The court didn't discuss whether a selective prohibition focused just on COVID-19, rather than just dealing (as malpractice and unprofessional conduct generally does) with all medical advice and treatment, might be impermissibly selective and thus be forbidden by R.A.V. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
After a review of the statutory provisions the Court found that the Copyright Act entitles Re:Sound to collect fees only on the basis of all sound recordings in Re:Sound’s repertoire and not all those eligible for equitable compensation, noting, among other reasons, that Re:Sound does not have a monopoly to act as the collective society and propose tariffs under Section 19. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 9:25 am
” Claim 9 requires that “the [hGAA]is a precursor” and refers to claim 1 for the antecedentbasis of “the [hGAA]. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Apr.19, 2006) (not reported in F.Supp.); accord Diabolic Video Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
” 750 ILCS 5/504(b-1)(1)(B) Any marriage that lasted under 5 years is not going to be a lot of maintenance. 33% of net income of the payor minus 25% of the income of the recipient for less than a year simply doesn’t amount to much. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 11:12 am
Generally, yes, employers may have to report the confirmed case of COVID-19 to OSHA, if two requirements are met: (1) the confirmed case of COVID-19 is “work-related,” and (2) the employee is hospitalized as an in-patient or dies because of the confirmed case of COVID-19. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:00 pm
The OA items herein were previously referenced on this blog as of 1 April 2023. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 10:37 am
Lopez, No. 19-50305 (5-21-21)(Murguia w/Boggs; M. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:12 am
So what exactly does this mean? [read post]
