Search for: "One Clothing Inc"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,631
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2014, 2:36 pm
On December 9, 2014, the Supreme Court unanimously held in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:00 am
For example, Busk did not disrupt one of the Court’s previous significant decision involving preliminary and postliminary time, IBP Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 1:46 pm
Strangers who had heard about the what happened wanted to help Johnson’s family, offering her food and clothing. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 10:29 pm
It may, in fact, be the only one. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:43 am
It involved employees of Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
” The motion cites the 2001 California Supreme Court Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:06 am
In Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:46 am
The decision, Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:21 am
[Refusal to register the mark shown below, for "Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweat shirts, jackets, shorts, pants, caps, and hats; Footwear, namely, boxing, wrestling, and mixed martial arts shoes" in view of the registered mark dtf, in standard character form, for "“clothing, namely, shirts, t shirts, caps, visors, jackets"].In re Duro-Last, Inc., Serial No. 85746099 (December 3, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:41 am
In Call of Duty: Ghosts, the selection screen looks like this: Unfortunately for Activision, one of these patches was a bit too close to real-life for one Mil-Spec Monkey Inc. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:34 am
Mad Croc Brands, Inc. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:25 am
Fortunately, Tenafly Eruv Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:48 am
medsearch7@optonline.net ©2014 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 5:04 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008); our numerous postson the subject. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:31 pm
Consumers in California have banned together to sue clothing retailers Gap Inc. and Banana Republic for allegedly using false and misleading advertisements to induce customers to pay full-price for items that they believed to be on sale. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:31 pm
Consumers in California have banned together to sue clothing retailers Gap Inc. and Banana Republic for allegedly using false and misleading advertisements to induce customers to pay full-price for items that they believed to be on sale. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
Acuff Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994) at 575). [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
For one, the BC Court of Appeal has now made it clear that it will be the effect and not the form of the clause which will be determinative. [read post]
