Search for: "3M" Results 61 - 80 of 1,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 1:25 pm
The EEOC found that 3M laid off many older, highly paid workers in an effort to save money. 3M has also said that it will pay up to $12 Million to resolve a class action brought in Minnesota in another age discrimination case. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:35 pm by Ashely Monti
Additionally, 3M created a “3M COVID-19 Fraud hotline” where purchasers can call for information and help to detect fraud. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
The recalled earmuffs are black with green or orange accents and are over-the-head, behind-the-head, hard hat-attached, or full brim hard hat-attached. 3M PELTOR is stamped on the outside of the earcups. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:13 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Based on this interpretation of the DOD data, 3M estimated the settlement value of the litigation at just $1 billion, prompting shares of 3M to rise 4% in reaction. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:52 pm by Matthew Huisman
In court documents filed last week, 3M accuses Boulter and Davis of trying to extort $34 million from 3M to settle the BacLite case. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 7:28 am by Searcy Law
The jury did not conclude that 3M’s combat arms earplugs were defective but still assessed 3M to be at fault for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 7:28 am by Searcy Law
The jury did not conclude that 3M’s combat arms earplugs were defective but still assessed 3M to be at fault for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 7:28 am by Searcy Law
The jury did not conclude that 3M’s combat arms earplugs were defective but still assessed 3M to be at fault for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 3:01 pm by Ryan J. Farrick
The former Army soldier claimed that 3M's notorious Combat Arms Earplugs caused permanent hearing damage. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:33 pm by luiza
 These were the provisions the SEC found 3M had violated with its Chinese subsidiary misconduct. 3M’s $6.5 million payout was relatively paltry and likely due to the relatively limited scope of the scheme. [read post]