Search for: "ALEXANDER v. HOLDER"
Results 61 - 80
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2017, 3:33 am
Take the recent case of Tungsten Partners LLC v Ace Group International LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 32025(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 20, 2017], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich was called upon to decide whether the plaintiff holder of a 4% non-voting profits interest, identified as a “Management Member” in a 65-page operating agreement (plus another 170 pages of schedules and exhibits), was a member of the… [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
© 2017 Alexander J. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:44 am
Holder and National Federation of Indepe [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
” Ultimately, “Reno and then-Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder presented the regulations in congressional testimony. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
The Federalists believed that the people were for them, but that the holders of state office would oppose them. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:30 am
The Virginia district court decision, Sarsour v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
i The Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the presidency are spare, and in every formal sense, at least, Donald J. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:45 am
With regard to Hamilton Uptown, LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
Holder and Evenwel v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
Deezer or Spotify:- all featured artists combined and listened to in a month share €0.46 euros- authors (SONGWRITERS) €1.0 euro- the state/ taxation €2.0 euros (more than the authors/ performers’ share combined)- producers (labels) and streaming services combined received €6.54.With no record labels willing to provide a panellist, it was left to Alexander Ross (Partner, Wiggin LLP) and chair Keith Harris OB (a band manager and until… [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:27 am
Alexander, August 28, 2015, Greenaway, J.)Derivative claims. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
In the 1996 decision of R v Hinchey, the Supreme Court went through this offence in detail and provided a breakdown of exactly what the Crown needed to prove in order to get a conviction. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:06 am
Holder, striking down the formula used to determine which state and local governments must comply with the Voting Rights Act’s preclearance requirement. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
JEKE Enterprises Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, in NLRB v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:37 am
Even under Kelo v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
To take just one example, while TCRR cites Alexander Polikoff’s Waiting for Gautreaux for the fact that 65 of the 75 staff attorneys in the Civil Rights Division protested the Justice Department’s change of position in Alexander v. [read post]
