Search for: "B. Reagan"
Results 61 - 80
of 544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2022, 9:34 am
Richard Nixon’s “law and order” strategy in the 70s, Ronald Reagan’s war on drugs in the 80s, and Bill Clinton’s “three strikes and you’re out” policy in the 90s: all together, by 2010 the United States incarcerated a larger percentage of its Black population than South Africa did at the height of Apartheid. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 7:23 am
Judge Royce Lamberth, a Reagan appointee, sentenced a defendant who had chartered buses of Capitol rioters to 60 days in jail and a $5,000 fine, even though prosecutors had asked for 14 days and no fine. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 12:47 pm
Going back decades, I personally found nothing exciting about Ronald Reagan's (in)famous line, "I'm paying for this microphone! [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am
This brief argued that the court need not engage in balancing the interests of the legislative and executive branches because (a) the Presidential Records Act (PRA), as amended in 2014, forecloses the ability of a former president to assert executive privilege without the incumbent’s support and (b) Biden’s rejection of Trump’s executive privilege claim, in any event, constituted a waiver of the privilege. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 6:48 am
(b) Nondelegation Doctrine. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:16 pm
And then, beginning in 2009, there's another book, "Shop Class as Soulcraft: An Inquiry Into the Value of Work" by Matthew B. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
For several weeks now, a constitutional conflict has been simmering on Capitol Hill. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 8:27 am
Part III-B of Regents begins on p. 17. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
I wasn't so sure, but: (a) I thought this school might be a poor fit for her for other reasons; and (b) it's her life. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Calabresi & Saikrishna B. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 5:16 am
But to reduce the Drug War to a product of Regan era racism, as Kendi does, is wildly oversimplistic, if for no other reasons than (a) various drug wars had been fought well before Reagan, including in places with few if any black people; (b) other, ethnically homogenous countries have also had drug wars; and (c) it was supported by liberal black legislators as much as anyone else. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
Reagan National Advertising of Texas Inc., 20-1029, concerns the constitutionality of a municipal sign restriction. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 12:01 pm
President Reagan, Remarks at a Ceremony Commemorating the 40th Anniversary of the Normandy Invasion, D-day 6 June 1984;6. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
Terrance Manion Books Our Band Could Be Your Life: Scenes from the American Indie Underground, 1981-1991 by Michael Azerrad This is the never-before-told story of the musical revolution that happened right under the nose of the Reagan Eighties–when a small but sprawling network of bands, labels, fanzines, radio stations, and other subversives reenergized American rock with punk rock’s do-it-yourself credo and created music that was deeply personal, often brilliant,… [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:30 am
(Indeed, the story Sherwin tells is one that history has witnessed happen more than once, and underscores the dangers of taking humans out of the equation, as countless viewers, including President Reagan, came to appreciate from watching the movie War Games.) [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
In a nutshell, President Ronald Reagan used an executive order to revolutionize the relationship of the White House to the bureaucracy. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2005. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 8:51 am
The executive order itself, which dates back to the Reagan administration, does not expressly limit targets, except for the general requirement that these targets be located abroad. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 1:26 pm
How should Americans, and Congress and the Biden administration, think about the problem of accountability for the past four years? [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am
Indeed, under Rule 104(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, most of what they offer would not even be relevant because it depends on premises for which the critics lack evidence sufficient to support a rational finding. [read post]
