Search for: "Brett"
Results 61 - 80
of 8,495
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Justice Brett Kavanaugh appeared sympathetic to the former president’s argument that criminal statutes do not apply to the president unless they say so specifically. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:12 pm
Brett David Dahl, a 43-year-old Victorville resident, was arrested on allegations of child endangerment, child abduction, contacting a minor to commit a felony and meeting with a minor for a lewd purpose, according to the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:07 pm
Justice Brett Kavanaugh elicited laughs when he asked if he had to “buy anything you just said on net neutrality” in order to rule in favor of the social-media companies. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm
Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked Turner to focus on “the actual dispute as it exists now. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 2:46 pm
” Justice Brett Kavanaugh followed up on the same point, suggesting that the three of them all see a strong textual argument against dismissal. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh all indicated that they would have denied the government’s request and allowed the rule to remain on hold. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
In the third concurrence, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Jackson, disagreed with Justice Gorsuch. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm
” But Justice Brett Kavanaugh was at least initially dubious that reversing the 9th Circuit’s decision and allowing the city to enforce its ordinances would make a difference in addressing the homelessness problem. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:17 am
Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas would have kept the regulation on hold during the appeals process. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Don’t believe what you’ve heard. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 8:56 am
Tonja Jacobi and Christopher Brett Jaeger (Emory University School of Law and Baylor Law School) have posted Katz’s Imperfect Circle: An Empirical Study of Reasonable Expectations of Privacy (Forthcoming, Florida Law Review, Vol. 77, 2025) on SSRN. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and any cert. petition; Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh voted to deny the stay. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
[Justice Kavanaugh laid out a unifying theory for the Shadow Docket.] [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
Trump cites a law review article by then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who before becoming a judge worked in the George W. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:27 am
Brett Murphy reports for Propublica. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
Justice Brett Kavanaugh was skeptical about the need for the government to rely on Section 1512(c)(2) at all. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:39 am
However, this 34-page decision included concurrences by Justices Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:38 pm
” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote his own 13-page concurring opinion, joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in which he focused on how the court should deal with emergency applications in cases – like this one – involving efforts to block enforcement of a new state or federal law. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
(2024), University of Punjab Jacobi, Tonja and Jaeger, Christopher Brett, Katz’s Imperfect Circle: An Empirical Study of Reasonable Expectations of Privacy (2024), Forthcoming, Florida Law Review, Vol. 77, 2025 Bradford, Anu, The False Choice Between Digital Regulation and Innovation (2024), Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 118, Issue 2, October 6, 2024 Wodajo, Kebene, Realising the Societal Dimensions of the Right to Freedom of Thought in the Digital Age Through Strategic… [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm
” Finally, Roberts rejected the argument (discussed with some interest by Justice Brett Kavanaugh at the oral argument) that the exemption should be limited to a particular industry because the references in the statute to “seamen” and “railroad employees” matched industry-specific regulatory systems that were in place when Congress adopted the FAA in 1925. [read post]
