Search for: "Burlington Northern Railway Co" Results 61 - 80 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2015, 8:39 am by Nathaniel M. Glasser
  The court refused to decide whether that element requires a showing of “material adversity” – as articulated for Title VII claims in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:50 am by Nathaniel M. Glasser
  The court refused to decide whether that element requires a showing of “material adversity” – as articulated for Title VII claims in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:23 pm by Laurence Hooper
As its authority the Fifth Circuit cited Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:31 am by Richard Renner
The Supreme Court got it right in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:17 am by Jamie LaPlante
Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:14 am by Joy Waltemath
It also argued that the state high court had not adopted Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
However, the US government through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit in 2001 against the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. under the Americans with Disabilities Act for secretly testing some workers for a genetic defect that some believe can predispose a person to carpal tunnel syndrome. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:42 pm
Supreme Court decision of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:02 am by Irvin M. Freilich
After careful analysis of the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:29 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, although the employer also argued that the “material adversity” standard outlined in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Supreme Court’s decision in the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, 129 S. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY; from Fort Bend County; 14th district (14-05-01106-CV, 237 SW3d 355, 06-21-07) (Justice O'Neill not sitting)08-0024 KENNETH HUTH v. [read post]