Search for: "C. v. Berlin" Results 61 - 80 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 3:07 am
Berlin - Law) have published Immunities in the Age of Global Constitutionalism (Brill | Nijhoff 2014). [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 7:46 am by Marcel Pemsel
The Higher Regional Court of Berlin (5 U 46/21) confirmed the revocation due to non-use for all goods and services. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 7:58 am by CMS
In particular Hassett v South Eastern Health Board (Case C-372/07) [2008] ECR I-7403 and Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe v JP Morgan Bank Chase Bank NA (Case C-144/10) [2011] WLR 2087 show that art 24 is to be construed narrowly and both were considered in the present case. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Nedim Malovic
The first and third questionsIn terms of assessing ‘genuine use’, the CJEU first noted that, according to Ansul BV v Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (C–40/01), the fact that a mark is not used for goods newly available on the market but rather for goods that were sold in the past does not mean that its use is not genuine. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
 Jeremy reports.* The harbour's no longer safe: personal data flow must find another way to goValentina Torelli tells all about the CJEU's decision in case C-362/14 Maximilian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, which the CJEU rendered last week. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Beck, Esquire of the Erie, Pennsylvania law firm of Shapira, Hutzelman, Berlin, Ely, Smith & Walsh for forwarding this Order to my attention.Joseph v. [read post]