Search for: "CAMPBELL v. HOLDER" Results 61 - 80 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2016, 3:54 am
" Review under Campbell v Acuff-Rose frameworkThe court reviewed the purpose and character of Google Books’ uses under Campbell’s framework. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:45 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 This is hardly surprising, since it was Judge Leval who wrote the 1990 article that coined the term transformative use and had such an influence on the Supreme Court in its 1994 decision in Campbell v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:42 am by Florian Mueller
"(emphasis added)In a nutshell, the above passage says:If what Google does basically just has a promotional effect, right holders can't complain that Google helps them make more money.But forget about "fair use" if there is a substitutive (rather than promotional) effect.If one applies that standard to Oracle v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
[W]hat WPMC are presenting amounts to a package of the [c]oncert [v]ideo with additional material. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Expressive content of photos can be entirely unaltered—Dillon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Full bodied: implication in Campbell that one ought to look at market benefits v. market harm. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
University of Washington School of Law: Fair Use In The Digital Age: The Ongoing Influence of Campbell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:06 am by Terry Hart
’” 6Alan Latman, Fair Use of Copyrighted Works, pg 7, Copyright Law Revision Study No. 14, US Copyright Office (1958); accord Campbell v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
The Purpose of this Truck is to Gather News First Fair Use Factor: Purpose and Character of the UseThe Supreme Court explained in 1994 in its Campbell v. [read post]