Search for: "CONSTITUTION PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA" Results 61 - 80 of 2,286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
” One’s employment status is a crucial component, therefore, in determining what, if any, benefits are owed to the injured party. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 10:40 am by Amy Howe
On Thursday the voters who filed the Colorado lawsuit urged the justices to act on the party’s appeal even more quickly. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The court reiterated that, where worker’s compensation is available, such compensation is the exclusive remedy for an injured party against their employer.The court found that the plain language of the exclusivity clause under the Worker’s Compensation Act barred this dog bite action that occurred at a workplace. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
They asked what third-party interests would be harmed if the religious liberty claim were granted.Three years later, in Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Does the Constitution Require Agencies to Use Biased Judges? [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 10:30 am by Mario Trujillo
Although the court found that the Colorado constitution protects users’ privacy interests in their search queries associated with a user’s IP address, it held that the Fourth Amendment does not, due to the third-party doctrine—reasoning that federal courts have held that there is no expectation of privacy in IP addresses. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
MSN – Sarah Ellison (Washington Post) | Published: 12/11/2023 For autocracy scholars and constitutional law experts, Donald Trump’s statements about being a dictator for a day if he is elected again raised alarms that he had thought carefully about how to consolidate the levers of power should he return to office in ways that eluded him in his first four years in the White House. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm by Barbara McQuade
“What the Constitution obligates you to do is to take back your plenary power because the certification was false, clearly,” Ellis claimed. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Also, pro tip: Rule 26, which Lindell tries to use, concerns party discovery. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am by Alan Neff
Of course, none of this inherently implies the guilt or liability of any party who has not yet pled out, been convicted, or found civilly liable for misconduct. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:10 am by Tom Joscelyn
He also assisted the efforts to try to get Vice President Mike Pence to violate his constitutional duties and act in defiance of the Electoral Count Act. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Jim Lindgren
" After the Pennsylvania Ratifying Convention, delegates in the Anti-Federalist minority, which cared deeply about the direct/indirect taxes line, issued a statement that identified the subjects of direct taxes as those on polls (as confirmed by the Constitution) and on "land, cattle, trades, occupations, etc. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
She also did volunteer work, becoming president of the local Junior League and, with her husband, got involved in Arizona Republican Party politics. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The court partially blocked Smith’s effort in a ruling that relied on the Constitution’s “speech or debate” clause. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:20 am
In the non-precedential decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Smith v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:02 am by Tom Joscelyn
Our previous analysis provides additional reasons that Chesebro’s reported description of the Dec. 16 meeting with Trump warrants scrutiny.[3] As part of his false electors scheme, Chesebro argued that the Vice President should assume powers that are clearly not granted by the Constitution. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 151 F.2d 240 (3d Cir. 1945) Pierson v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
However, as all parties agree, cases construing the ACCA call for a comparison of the statutory offenses, not the particular individual's conduct. [read post]