Search for: "Citibank" Results 61 - 80 of 1,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2021, 1:03 pm by Smith Eibeler LLC
  In November of 2020, Lilach Kuhn, the defendant, entered Citibank’s Englewood, NJ branch without a mask in direct violation of Executive Order 122, enacted in April 2020, requiring face coverings in public spaces in an attempt to slow the spread of COVID-19. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:29 am by Ram Eachambadi | JURIST Staff
The court granted the IRS permission to serve “John Doe” summonses on 10 entities including Federal Express Corporation and its affiliates, DHL Express, UPS, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, The Clearing House Payments Company LLC, HSBC Bank USA, Citibank NA, Wells Fargo Bank NA, and Bank of America NA. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 7:18 am by Daily Record Staff
Pearson Vice Chairman M&T Bank After working for Citicorp Credit Services and Citibank Private Banking, Kevin J. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:38 am by John Jascob
Citibank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and East West Bank were ordered to transfer the entire balance of 13 accounts held by Liu, Wang, Proton, and other entities to the Commission; the accounts had been previously frozen pursuant to a court order.The case is No. 8:16-cv-00974. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 11:33 am
(Citibank), acting in its capacity as administrative agent for a syndicated loan facility made available to Revlon, Inc., were entitled to keep almost $500 million of Citibank’s own money. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 5:01 am by Thalia Kruger
Citibank, 201 F.3d 134, 138 (2d Cir. 2000), and an Iranian judgment against the sister of the former Shah, Bank Melli Iran v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 1:28 pm by Howard Bashman
“Schoolyard Justice in Federal Court; Citibank’s errant billion-dollar payment leads to a ruling that could upset commercial law”: Law professor Jonathan Macey has this op-ed in today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
14 May 2021, 2:23 pm by Mitu Gulati
The abstract for Elisabeth's paper is here: The Citibank case dealt with a $900 million payment sent in error to the lenders of Revlon, Inc., in the midst of a fraught dispute over the loan restructuring. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 8:49 am by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
Citibank, N.A., 2 Cal.5th 945 (2017), the California Supreme Court held that under California law, a provision in any contract purporting to waive a party’s right to seek public injunctive relief in any forum is contrary to public policy and unenforceable. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 3:08 am by Jeremy Telman
Citibank mistakenly sent $900 million in wire transfers to a bunch of entities... [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 10:07 pm by lennyesq
The error occurred on August 11 last year, when Citibank was supposed to wire $7.8m (£5.6m) in interest payments to lenders who are propping up troubled cosmetics giant Revlon. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 9:15 am by Kristian Soltes
“To believe that Citibank, one of the most sophisticated financial institutions in the world, had made a mistake that had never happened before, to the tune of nearly $1 billion would have been borderline irrational,” wrote Furman, who presides in Manhattan. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:09 am by Astarita
According to CNN, Citibank, acting as Revlon's loan agent, accidently wired 100 times more than it intended, to Revlon's lenders. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 12:04 pm by Colleen Baker
In August 2020, Citibank, as administrative agent for a syndicated loan to Revlon, Inc., accidently wired nearly $900 million to lenders. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 10:59 am by Timothy B. Lee
Citibank was acting as an agent for Revlon, which owed hundreds of millions of dollars to various creditors. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
This is an unusual federal appellate ruling interpreting CAN-SPAM because it came to the court from the Board of Immigration Appeals. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 1:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Citibank, N.A., 2 Cal.5th 945 (2017)—that an arbitration agreement waiving statutory remedies under California consumer protection law is unenforceable—was unnecessary to the decision. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 11:18 am by Aaron Rubin
Citibank, which held that a contract that waives a person’s right to seek public injunctive relief in court is invalid under California law. [read post]