Search for: "Clark v. Internal Revenue Service"
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
Clarke 13-301Issue: Whether an unsupported allegation that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a summons for an improper purpose entitles an opponent of the summons to an evidentiary hearing to question IRS officials about their reasons for issuing the summons. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Review of State and Local Car Rental Excise Taxes Excise taxes on rental cars are a common source of revenue for states and localities seeking revenue that disproportionately comes from nonresidents. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
(Hat tips: Clark Lindsey.)Speaking of COTS, this blog is not Space War Probe: But the third quarter issue of MilsatMagazine focuses on COTS business.Newspace and the "Netscape moment": Leonard David overviews things (Space News).V-Prize visions: Zip over to lawyer and great guy Jack Kennedy's Spaceports, for v-cool news on the V-Prize challenge. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
However, unlike the Internal Revenue Code, which includes a definition of “alimony,” 26 U.S.C.A. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
(ii) When offense 23 of the annexed Schedule, or an attempt to commit, or a conspiracy to commit, or being a party to the commission of that offense, has been committed on board an aircraft engaged in commercial services carrying passengers. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:49 pm
Program v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
The expense is booked as “consulting services” in the Canadian company’s books. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Global Broadcast News Ltd & Ors (Spicy IP) Foraying into non-traditional identity: non-traditional trade mark registrations (International Law Office) India's first 'doctrine of equivalents' case: Ravi Kamal Bali v Kala Tech (Spicy IP) Response to the Mint article on alleged corruption in the Indian Patent Offices (Patent Circle) Transparency in the court: recording oral proceedings - the way forward? [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Department of Social Services. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Department of Social Services. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
The City submitted a $3.3 million dollar revenue bond to fund the sewer project, which was approved by the voters. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
The invoices Cohen submitted each stated that it was “pursuant to [a] retainer agreement” and each sought “payment for services rendered” for the relevant month of the invoice. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
This question had been unsettled earlier, see, e.g., Clark v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Today they capture over 25% of that revenue. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
’: (LawFont.com)BrazilElectronic copies of oppositions now available on internet: (International Law Office)CanadaSam Trosow on latest CMEC copyright bulletins: (Michael Geist),ComputerWorld Canada on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Deemed abandonment provisions pose traps for the unwary: (International Law Office),Trade mark appeals: stays and service requirements: (Canadian Trademark Blog),Franchising into Canada: (IP finance),More Champagne, anyone? [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
” The facts of Irvin v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service then intervened in an effort to get labor and management to agree. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Introduction Decisions not to buy or sell goods or services are generally not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
