Search for: "Cooper v. Holder"
Results 61 - 80
of 553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm
Circuit action has taken place in the case of Trump v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:59 am
At the start of this year, Nokia v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:32 am
Based upon a settlement in Shergill v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:51 am
In the immediate wake of the Belcher v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 8:33 am
In light of the NMA, DOJ cooperated with the U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"[17] [V.] [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
Pix Credit: Council of Europe--Paris Principles at 25. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 6:04 am
Major SEP holders Ericsson, Nokia, and InterDigital as well as IP Europe (which counts those three companies among its members) provided some early input, as did ACT, a U.S. lobbying front for Apple and other net licensees of SEPs.Horizontal cooperation relating to SEPs can take three different forms:Standard-setting itself is a form of cooperation between companies that usually compete with each other.Patent pools like Avanci (the first-named defendant in the U.S. case I… [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 3:11 am
” The above-noted HB589 was put on hold due to the Shelby County v Holder decision pending before the US Supreme Court in 2013, which ultimately gutted many fundamental protections offered by the Voting Rights Act 1965. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
Cooper. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
Cooper. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 2:49 pm
” Cooper Indus., 899 N.E.2d at 1288. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
Regents and the Role of Reasoned Decisionmaking in Termination of Programs In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:15 pm
Cooper Supreme Court decision. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:32 pm
” Locasto v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 7:29 am
The Ninth Circuit ruling in FTC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
Likewise, setting adequate compensation, as required under TRIPS Article 31(h) has never been predictable or easily administered.[15] Additionally, and of similar importance, other questions remain outstanding, including which countries qualify for parallel imports,[16] navigating the complexities of licensing agreements,[17] ensuring timeliness during public health emergencies,[18] and achieving cooperation from pharmaceutical companies who arguably have little incentive to… [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
