Search for: "Court Employees of Public Defender's Office"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2016, 1:15 pm
What exactly is the crime of resisting a public officer? [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:15 pm
What exactly is the crime of resisting a public officer? [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Tests used by court to determine if a public officer or employee is entitled to “qualified immunity” when he or she is being sued for damages in a civil action Lawson v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 4:57 am
This act reduced state and municipal employers’ collective-bargaining obligations to non-public safety employees in the public sector. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:52 am
The language relating to whistleblower protection specifically states that it applies to public companies, or officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors or agents of such companies. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:08 pm
Officers must swear an oath for their jobs, while employees and agents need not. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
In contrast to §18 of the Public Officers Law, §17.2(a) of the Public Officers Law provides for “Defense and indemnification of state officers and employees” in civil and federal actions, including actions brought pursuant to 42 USC §1981 or 42 USC §1983.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_06916.htm [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
” The Supreme Court agreed with the defendant. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:41 am
The district court concluded that the County did not have a duty to defend and/or indemnify Officer Glen Gutierrez because he was not a “public employee” or “law enforcement officer” of a “governmental entity” as those terms are defined by the New Mexico Tort Claims Act (the TCA), NMSA 1978, §§ 41-4-1 to -30 (1976, as amended through 2013). [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
*** Although not all state employee are state public officers, all state public officers are state public employees. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
*** Although not all state employee are state public officers, all state public officers are state public employees. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:18 am
When Joel Ganzman, the Deputy Public Administrator of the Office of the Public Administrator of Kings County [Office] was named as a defendant in a Federal discrimination suit, [Gryga v Ganzman, Docket No. 97 Civ 3929, USDC, EDNY], he asked Michael D. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 12:07 pm
Most federal circuit courts have held that people generally have a right to record what police officers do in public places. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower courts’ decisions, Judge Pigott dissenting.* Presumably the same ruling would control with respect to officers and employees of the State as the employer seeking “defense and indemnification” pursuant to §17 of the Public Officers Law in any civil action or proceeding in any state or federal court arising out of any alleged act or omission which occurred or is alleged in the… [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:42 am
County not required to defend or indemnify an employee being sued if alleged act or omission was not within the scope of the employee’s dutiesRew v County of Niagara, 2010 NY Slip Op 04009, decided on May 7, 2010, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentPublic Officers Law §17, with respect to State officers and employees and Public Officers Law §18, with respect to officers and employees of… [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 8:03 am
According to the defendant, there was no way for the officer who conducted the public records check to know if the information he received was accurate, and it was thus unreasonable for him to use the records check as a basis for obtaining a search warrant. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
** Employee did not apply for indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law or the Public Authorities Law.*** Typically "indemnification provisions" such as those set out in Public Officers Law §§17, 18, and 19 provide for the reimbursement of reasonable attorneys' fees and litigation expenses incurred "by or on behalf of an employee in his or her defense of a criminal proceeding in a state or… [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
** Employee did not apply for indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law or the Public Authorities Law.*** Typically "indemnification provisions" such as those set out in Public Officers Law §§17, 18, and 19 provide for the reimbursement of reasonable attorneys' fees and litigation expenses incurred "by or on behalf of an employee in his or her defense of a criminal proceeding in a state or… [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
** Employee did not apply for indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law or the Public Authorities Law.*** Typically "indemnification provisions" such as those set out in Public Officers Law §§17, 18, and 19 provide for the reimbursement of reasonable attorneys' fees and litigation expenses incurred "by or on behalf of an employee in his or her defense of a criminal proceeding in a state or… [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
** Employee did not apply for indemnification pursuant to Public Officers Law or the Public Authorities Law.*** Typically "indemnification provisions" such as those set out in Public Officers Law §§17, 18, and 19 provide for the reimbursement of reasonable attorneys' fees and litigation expenses incurred "by or on behalf of an employee in his or her defense of a criminal proceeding in a state or… [read post]
