Search for: "D&N, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 5,384
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
[The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found (by default judgment) to have committed the assault, but Judge Wilkinson's concurrence argues that, absent this unusual factor, one-sided pseudonymity should be frowned on.] [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 5:29 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Court concluded that Dvir “is removed as an officer of Slim’s Bagels and Bialys, Inc. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:14 am by Evan Brown
Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004, 1013 n.2 (9th Cir. 2001) aff’d,  284 F.3d 1091 (2002) the court noted that “[s]econdary liability for copyright infringement does not exist in the absence of direct infringement by a third party. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The three most-consulted French-language decisions were: Gestion George Kyritsis inc. c. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:57 am by Karen Gullo
Statement to be submitted by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, accredited under operative paragraph No. 9 of UN General Assembly Resolution 75/282, on behalf of 124 signatories. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
SPCA noticed the underlying plaintiff’s lawsuits to its D&O carrier, seeking coverage under several successive policies in effect between 2006 and 2012. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : Groupe Essa inc. c. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Client and Employee Poaching Claims A common claim noticed under private company D&O policies and one that often raises the question of Section 533’s applicability involves an insured’s liability for poaching clients or employees from a competitor. [read post]