Search for: "DOES 1-442" Results 61 - 80 of 522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
On appeal, the defendants claim that (1) the California judgment is unenforceable for lack of personal jurisdiction, (2) the contract is unenforceable under the Home Solicitation Sales Act (HSSA), General Statutes § 42-134a et seq., and (3) the amount of damages awarded by the trial court was improper. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
It does not include any refundable portions of these credits. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 9 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:21 am by Rachel Casper
See Meehan, 404 Mass. at 442 (where court adopts a rule that “encourages partners in the future to disclose seasonably and fully any plans to remove cases. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:29 am by Lawrence Moore
Bouaphakeo, 577 U.S. 442 (2016), as implicitly overruling Comcast, providing an exception when it comes to considering an expert’s opinion. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 8:38 am by Russell Knight
Where the ground for objection does not appear until after the admission of the evidence, the appropriate action for its opponent is to make a motion to strike. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
By Sarah McKibbin, University of Southern Queensland Epic Games, the developer of the highly popular and lucrative online video game Fortnite, recently won an appeal against tech juggernaut, Apple, in Australia’s Federal Court.[1] Fortnite is played by over three million Apple iOS users in Australia.[2] In April 2021, Justice Perram awarded Apple a temporary three-month stay of proceedings on the basis of an exclusive foreign choice of court agreement in favour of the courts of the… [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 12:06 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Trees The Maryland Attorney General recently issued an opinion concluding that the placement of a protective easement on an already existing forest, as opposed to intentionally created or restored forest, does not qualify for forest mitigation banking. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am by Florian Mueller
Legal framework [in fact, this section discusses purely the statutory framework, not yet the appellate case law][European] Union lawThe following passages are excerpts from the recitals of Directive 2004/48/EC:(1) The achievement of the Internal Market entails [...] [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 11:33 am by Jonathan Holbrook
Moore, 311 N.C. 442 (1984) (principal is one “who actually perpetrates the crime either by his own hand or through an innocent agent“); State v. [read post]