Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 61 - 80
of 12,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2022, 12:17 pm
Ala.) in today's Doe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:48 am
Although some view Turner as not breaking new doctrinal ground, I think it does tee up one interesting legal question. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:08 pm
Does 1-14 targeting University of Arizona students, in both of which the university's plea fell on deaf ears, the respective subpoenas would have been quashed as to all, or at least most, of the students.Accordingly, I urge every practitioner who is consulted by a John Doe defendant, and is contemplating a motion to vacate the ex parte discovery order and quash the subpoena issued under it -- whether through a college or university or… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:01 pm
I, sec. 27. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
The first decision I’ve seen on this issue is Henry v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
., Goddard v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:45 pm
It’s one thing to argue that the Fourteenth Amendment permits affirmative action (and in some narrow situations, I think it does), and quite another to suggest that it bans states from abolishing it through their state constitutions. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:19 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
Since the Supreme Court of Ohio slows down in the summer, I want to go back and pick up the case of State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 1:54 pm
As best as I can tell, this is their holding:When a defendant presents evidence through a psychological expert who has examined him, the government likewise is permitted to use the only effective means of challenging that evidence: testimony from an expert who has also examined him. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:05 pm
The court approved the request for early discovery, but had questions about the propriety of joining Does 2 through 101 in the same lawsuit. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Defendant who ran through the house of a friend evading the police did not show that he had standing. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court heard argument last month in McCoy v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 11:00 pm
Caldwell v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
That case involved an officer asking a suspect “Do you mind if I look through your phone? [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:25 am
If a non-testifying defendant’s statement becomes powerfully incriminating against a co-defendant, through context or otherwise, the defendant becomes a “witness against” the co-defendant and the confrontation clause is violated. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:00 am
[A]sk yourself now ‘why on earth would I wait until now to try to tell that story if I had that kind of story? [read post]
18 May 2020, 8:44 am
Fallon recommends the Court grant defendant Vudu’s partial motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims of induced infringement asserted in Count I, Counts II through V, and Count VII of the complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:31 pm
I'm not entirely sure I'm super excited about affecting third party rights through such a procedure (like here). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 7:07 am
Not a single Justice in West Virginia v. [read post]
