Search for: "ESPN 1 & 2" Results 61 - 80 of 306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2009, 8:09 am
These issues will have to be tested in a later trial it appears. 2: Photographer Sues ESPN for Copyright Infringement over Unauthorized Photo Use Next up today, photographer Sherry Martin is suing both Competitor Magazine and ESPN over a the digital use of a photograph she took of triathlete Dr. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 1:19 pm
ESPN did start the game on Classic, but switched with barely any warning. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 9:50 am
Source: UFC Buys Pride for Less than $70 Million, ESPN, Mar. 27, 2007, [sports.espn.go.com] 2. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:49 am
" Documents reflecting negotiations qualified as AEO.(2) financing and operating agreements. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Canadian Combat Sports Law Blog 2. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 6:17 pm by admin
The results were revealed by ESPN in December of the same year.(4) Major League Baseball penalized Braun with a 50-game suspension. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:37 pm
According to ESPN, "Odom refused all chemical tests and was booked for investigation of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs at 5:01 a.m., CHP officials said." [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 10:40 am by kris
I find it disheartening that 1) institutions still offer these jobs in the first place and 2) that these decisions also receive praise (see this article that details communication to and from Grambling folks after the announcement of the hiring).Grambling State did not have to walk back the offer because Briles officially resigned. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:21 pm by Matt Johnston
These factors can place some attention on a new CBA at a time when MLS will be looking for more money from the sports broadcasting giant.2. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 3:02 pm
  Generally, to prevail on a temporary injunction, a petitioner must show: 1) that he or she is likely to succeed on the merits of the case, and 2) that there is no other adequate remedy at law. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:00 am by Karen Brennan
  There are generally three opinions as to ownership of the phrase: (1) the NFL believes they own it; (2) Who Dat Inc. believe they own it; and (3) Saints fans (and merchandise retailers) believe no one owns it. [read post]