Search for: "EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY" Results 61 - 80 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2016, 7:33 am by Kevin Pollack
Dalton Jr. recently held that Evanston Insurance Company has no duty to defend a builder in a lawsuit alleging construction defects at one of its Florida condominium complexes based on an exclusion in the policy for damage to the developer’s own work.1 The lawsuit arose when DiMucci Development Corp. of Ponce Inlet Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm by Patrick E. Knie
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company Impostor’s Fraud Does Not Vitiate South Carolina Medical Malpractice Insurance Coverage for Facility or Innocent Co-InsuredsEvanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm by Patrick E. Knie
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company Impostor’s Fraud Does Not Vitiate South Carolina Medical Malpractice Insurance Coverage for Facility or Innocent Co-InsuredsEvanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
The plaintiffs contended the noncompetition provision at issue was no broader than necessary to protect the company’s interest in the list. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 12:28 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
 As you can see from the Bill Cosby case many times an insurance company is simply interested in keeping fees low and not in ensuring the best defense of its insured. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:11 am by Robert Kreisman
The parties settled before trial for $3.27 million, which included $250,000 from Harrison’s primary auto insurance policy and $3 million from his umbrella insurance policy and just under $20,000 from Harrison’s employer’s insurance company. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:41 am by Robert Kreisman
Before trial, the parties agreed to settle the case for $12 million, which was paid by the insurance company for Red Classic Transit. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 7:20 am by Mark S. Humphreys
However, the statute does not apply to claims brought by third-party insurance policies for losses incurred in satisfaction of a settlement, which was the ruling by the Texas Supreme Court in, Evanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Robert Kreisman
The insurance company repeated its offer shortly after the ruling on CHR’s post-trial motion. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:58 pm by Robert Kreisman
The purpose of financial responsibility insurance is to protect those who would otherwise be uninsured, not to protect other insurance companies. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 8:21 am by Don Cruse
The Fifth Circuit originally ruled in favor of BP, concluding that the insurance policy itself did not limit the scope of coverage afforded to BP and that, under EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 8:21 am by Don Cruse
BP contends that only the insurance policy language matters in deciding whether it is an "additional insured," citing cases such as EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 6:13 pm by Andrew
This is a large company with a lot of trucks and drivers in their employ, meaning that they also have a lot of resources to defend themselves against accident and insurance claims, if need be. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 4:45 pm by Robert Kreisman
In an April 1, 2013 letter, plaintiff Sunliz said it wanted to inspect the corporation’s records “to determine the financial condition of the company, the character of the management of the company and whether the company’s financial practices were appropriate. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 4:30 pm by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: Illinois Appellate Court Finds that Failure to Perfect Subrogation Rights Does Not Allow for Equitable Tolling of the Statute of Limitations Illinois Appellate Court Finds That Rental Car Companies Must Be Treated No Differently Than Any Other Self-Insured Entity Illinois Appellate Court Reverses Dismissal of Asbestos-Injured Employee by   by Robert Kreisman     [read post]