Search for: "Expressions Originals, Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 4,005
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
As originally enacted in 1976, Congress charged the Secretary of Commerce (a named respondent in both Loper Bright and Relentless) with developing “advisory guidelines,” which were to be based on the national standards set forth in the subsection (a) and would “assist” in developing fishery management plans.[4] Let’s stop right there. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Poplin (Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP) just filed this brief on my behalf Friday; they drafted it based generally on some thoughts that I'd expressed in this 2021 Tablet article. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Stegall, 653 F.2d 180, 185–86 (5th Cir. 1981) (permitting plaintiffs to proceed pseudonymously because the lawsuit revealed their unpopular personal beliefs); Choice, Inc. of Tex. v. [read post]
The suspension was originally enforced on the members over charges of disruptive conduct within the lower house. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 11:15 am by Logan Castellanos
The 2023 Corn Decree cleared up much of the confusion surrounding the language of the original decree. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 11:15 am by Logan Castellanos
The 2023 Corn Decree cleared up much of the confusion surrounding the language of the original decree. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
Read the Commissioner’s original response here and his updated response here. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am by Adeline Chong
Guest post by Professor Yeo Tiong Min, SC (honoris causa), Yong Pung How Chair Professor of Law, Yong Pung How School of Law, Singapore Management University Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (formerly known as Merck & Co, Inc) v Merck KGaA (formerly known as E Merck) [2021] 1 SLR 1102, [2021] SGCA 14 (“Merck”), noted previously, is a landmark case in Singapore private international law, being a decision of a full bench of the Court of Appeal setting out for the first time in… [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Felix Manufacturing Inc., Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Allianz Insurance Company, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm by Thomas James
Copyright Fair Use Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 6:08 am
” That being said, the original purpose behind written change orders still holds sway. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Whether a use qualifies as a “fair use” is determined by an inquiry that examines the purpose of the use, the amount used, and the impact on the market of the original work[15] – including whether the subsequent work is a “transformation” of the original (and therefore not a market substitute).[16] Proponents of the fair use basis argue both that what AI models do with protected content is permitted fair use,[17] and that policy considerations… [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Home Depot, Inc., No. 11 WAP 2022 (Pa. [read post]