Search for: "FTC v. AT&T Mobility" Results 61 - 80 of 297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:37 pm
For a long time I’ve been meaning to write a post about the ongoing saga of the Seventh Circuit appeal in Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Google’s share of general search on European mobile phones is reported to be about 96%. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:08 am by Rebecca Weitzman
These companies—AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile—have sold millions of smartphones to consumers running versions of Google’s Android operating system. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 2:02 am by Florian Mueller
But the assumption that Nokia and Qualcomm would never have amended their 2008 agreement despite earth-shaking subsequent case law such as TransCore (a 2009 Federal Circuit decision according to which an unconditional covenant not to sue triggers exhaustion), and despite Nokia later exiting the mobile device business, flies in the face of all I know about industry practice and from following the FTC v. [read post]
And click here to read the full opinion of the court in FTC v Wyndham Worldwide, which the FTC says characterizes as “a must-read for business executives and attorneys. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 12:24 pm by Berin Szoka
The FTC had previously announced that it would accelerate the review, which had been planned for 2015, particularly because of concerns about the mobile marketplace, as noted in the FTC’s report on that topic released in February. [read post]