Search for: "Gamble v. The Examiner"
Results 61 - 80
of 339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2010, 10:34 am
Synthetic ABSs look more like pure gambles. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 3:14 am
Examining Attorney Melissa S. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:39 am
Legal and quasi-legal topics to be examined using an economic lens include: (i) gambling; (ii) Title IX; (iii) minimum age rules; (iv) crime; and (v) referee-decision making. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:39 pm
[Examiner] * Hardened terrorists v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 12:22 pm
If you happen to be from California (or enjoy gambling at the Mirage or Palms casinos in Las Vegas), you may be familiar with a small chain of frozen yogurt shops called “Blizz Frozen Yogurt” owned by a California company by the name of Yogubliz, Inc. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:23 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 4:39 am
More on Febreze/Air WickLast week the IPKat posted a short note on Procter & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser [2006] EWHC 3154 (Ch) (available here) in which Mr Justice Lewison of the Patents Court held that the packaging of Reckitt Benckiser's Air Wick Odour Stop infringed Procter & Gamble's validly-registered Community design for the packaging of Febreze (a custom-designed canister surmounted by a trigger within a housing). [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:54 pm
FCC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
We partnered with our federal counterparts to examine the full scope of the alleged illegal gambling operation. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
We partnered with our federal counterparts to examine the full scope of the alleged illegal gambling operation. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:45 am
The decisionThe Board first noted that for a sign to possess distinctive character, it must serve to identify the goods and services in respect of which registration is sought as originating from a particular undertaking, and thus to distinguish those goods and services from those of other undertakings (C-473/01 P, Procter & Gamble v OHIM). [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:35 am
Gamble v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:04 pm
Internet posts a “gamble. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:04 pm
Internet posts a “gamble. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
With its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm
Procter Gamble Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:16 am
It should be even more challenging since the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Gamble v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 1:47 pm
Procter & Gamble Co., 105 Cal. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Gamble v. [read post]
