Search for: "General Printing & Design, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 807
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
  [TTABlogged here].In re Nordic Naturals, Inc., Appeal No. 13-1492 (Serial No. 77131419, March 27, 2013) [Refusals to register CHILDREN'S DHA for "nutritional supplements containing DHA" on the grounds of genericness and, alternatively, mere descriptiveness and lack of acquired distinctiveness, and further on the ground that applicant failed to enter a required amendment of the identification of goods to indicate that the goods are formulated for children].In re The Newbridge… [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:53 am by John L. Welch
BACKRACK was not used generically in the printed publications placed in evidence.Turning to Respondent's policing efforts, much of the activity occurred after this case began, but Respondent did in fact attempt to enforce its rights earlier, and many complied with Respondent's requests. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:58 am
Theragen, Inc., Opposition No. 91250143 (September 24, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc Bergsman) [Sustaining opposition to registration of THERAGEN and THERAGEN & Design for "Medical devices, namely, electrostimulatory devices for tissue, bone and/or joint treatment, medical treatment apparel, and a kit comprising an electrostimulatory device and medical treatment apparel" in view of the registered mark THERAGUN for massages apparatus and… [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:37 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  However, most Health Plans will want to avoid the added cost and expense of the printing and distribution of this notification. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:12 pm by Nikki Siesel
This could be what distinguishes this case from the two cases cited in support by the applicant, Juice Generation, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
In filing this letter, Engine was joined by a 3D printing startup. 3D printing is definitely an area in which excessive design patent damages could have a devastating effect.The brief does a very good job of looking at the problem from a startup angle. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:40 am by John L. Welch
But petitioner "submitted no evidence of use from a printed publication of the phrase 'Annapolis tours' per se as a generic designation for respondent's services." [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 10:34 am by Steve Baird
Yet, there was something different about the VIRGINIA BRAND designation. [read post]