Search for: "Grant Keller"
Results 61 - 80
of 502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 12:30 pm
Keller: And, Justice Kagan, they can do that….. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 8:32 am
The State agrees that Applicant is entitled to relief.The substantive debate played out in the dissenting opinion by Judge Sharon Keller and a concurrence by Judge Elsa Alcala, who ironically applied the same deferential standard to local prosecutors and the trial court that one normally sees from Keller and Co. when the state wants to hang-em-high. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 10:24 pm
Yes, cert was granted that day, but the Supreme Court doesn’t just grant cert out of the blue. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:14 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions Body: SC18689 - Keller v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:24 pm
Keller is an appeal of an immigration judge's decision denying Mr. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 11:34 am
Part 5 of the Keller and Heckman Infrastructure Act Blog Series This is the fifth in Keller and Heckman’s series of posts pertaining to the new Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (H.R. 3684) (“the IIJA” or “the Act”), which was signed into law on November 15, 2021. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
"We look forward to getting these dedicated funds out to counties in the coming months so that they can be put to work for indigent defense as intended," said Commission Chair Sharon Keller. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:04 pm
Not that I found Judge Hervey's reasoning in that Haynes as persuasive as Presiding Judge Keller's and Judge Cochran's dissents, I'm just sayin' is all.] [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 9:20 am
John Gapper writes:As Mr Keller [of the New York Times] says, reporting is expensive. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 6:54 am
I would grant certiorari to address this important question. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:30 pm
" In re Keller (9th Cir. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 11:51 am
Part 6 of the Keller and Heckman Infrastructure Act Blog Series This is our 6th entry in our blog series on the major provisions of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (“the IIJA” or “the Act”). [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:40 am
Eggemeyer (2015-SC-625, rendered April 27, 2017), the Kentucky Supreme Court’s Justice Keller considered the circumstances under which it is appropriate for an appellate court to order a new trial. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 10:55 pm
If Judge Keller had granted an extension that another judge had opposed, would anyone be trying to remove her? [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 12:37 pm
In addition, section 1-103 of the Real Property Article provides:Unless otherwise expressly provided, any obligation imposed on or right granted to any person automatically is binding on or inures to the benefit of his assigns, successors, heirs, legatees, and personal representatives.Because the parties did not expressly provide that the right would not bind the Grantee's successors and assigns, it did so bind them. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 6:46 am
(I mean, if Judge Keller had just outright granted the extension that would've been a clearer violation of the Court's own protocols, so it's not the "protocols" we're concerned with.) [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 4:42 pm
But it is not behavior that should be taken for granted in crafting laws of general application. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:59 am
Our second post covered the $1 Billion Middle Mile Grant Program Opportunity. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 7:18 am
The trial court granted summary judgment. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:55 am
A Kentucky federal court recently granted a motion to exclude expert testimony by a former Kentucky Supreme Court judge concerning bad faith issues. [read post]
