Search for: "HIGHMARK"
Results 61 - 80
of 236
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 8:53 am
Blue Cross and Shield of Massachusetts, Highmark, Inc., AmeriHealth Caritas, Health Care Service Corp and Blue Shield of California have also announced that they will no longer provide coverage for power morcellator procedures for women unless the procedures and the doctors performing them are preapproved to do so. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:53 am
Blue Cross and Shield of Massachusetts, Highmark, Inc., AmeriHealth Caritas, Health Care Service Corp and Blue Shield of California have also announced that they will no longer provide coverage for power morcellator procedures for women unless the procedures and the doctors performing them are preapproved to do so. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 12:30 pm
In its parallel 2014 Highmark decision, the Supreme Court also held that the district court’s determination regarding exceptional case awards should be given deference on appeal. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:33 am
In the parallel case of Highmark, the court held that those lower-court determinations should be given deference on appeal. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
The grand jury indictment suggests the frauds against Highmark Community Blue Shared Cost plan totaled more than $600,000. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:40 am
” Still, even granting the arguable incoherence as a matter of policy, the backdrop of the Court’s decision last year in Highmark v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:42 am
(Click here for the Highmark case). [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:40 pm
Guest Post by Professor Shubha Ghosh, University of Wisconsin Law School Congratualtions to Hannah Jiam for her great work on attorney’s fee shifting after the Supreme Court’s 2014 Octane Fitness and Highmark decisions! [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:50 am
(citing Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 7:03 pm
Supreme Court decisions in the Octane Fitness and Highmark cases, judges now have greater discretion to enforce legitimate patent rights and also are empowered to punish patent trolls through provisions that include requiring plaintiffs that filed abusive litigation to cover the defendants’ legal costs.Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/op-ed/article20746014.html#storylink=cpylink: http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/op-ed/article20746014.html [read post]
6 May 2015, 6:50 am
Highmark, a health insurer in the eastern United States, stopped paying for laparoscopic power morcellation in gynecologic procedures. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:48 am
The GA should then check the daily activity reports and commission statements to see if this information was sent to Highmark, prior to taking any additional action. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm
Ct. 1749 (2014), or Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:09 am
In light of Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:14 am
., was the primary decision simply because that case was treated first by the Court and formed the basis of the Court’s decision in Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
It appears Octane Fitness and Highmark may be changing that. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:00 pm
Thus, even applying the deferential standardof review under Highmark, the district court’s feeaward must be set aside. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:10 am
Icon Health and Fitness and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
Category: Infringement By: Abby Lin, Contributor Case:Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:21 am
Pulse last fall, suggests that the Federal Circuit remains divided on the appropriate legal standard for willful infringement post-Highmark and Octane Fitness. [read post]
