Search for: "Hodges v. Wilson"
Results 61 - 80
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2016, 8:48 am
Wilson Constr. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes, Lord Hodge The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Belhaj & Anor v Straw & Ors; Rahmatullah v Ministry of Defence & Anor, heard 9–12 November 2015. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am
The panel will be Lords Neuberger, Sumption, Reed, Carnwath, and Hodge. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Hodges), (24 William & Mary Bill of Rights 341 (2015)).Yuvraj Joshi, The Respectable Dignity of Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 12:58 pm
In the number one spot is the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:46 pm
Supreme Court held on June 26, in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Supreme Court Judgment The wife’s appeal was heard together with Mrs Gohil’s on 8, 9 and 10 June 2015 before Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Reed and Hodge. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
The appeal was heard by a panel of five judges comprising Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:32 pm
Hodges, the Supreme Court case that validated marriage equality. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:45 pm
Hodges this past June is a crudely written joke. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm
Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson find that Article 8.1 ECHR is engaged (although the interference can be justified on the ground of Article 8.2, on the basis that the act of publication of the image was a necessary interference by a public authority in accordance with the law), while Lord Clarke, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge disagree and opine that Article 8.1 is not engaged on the facts of this case. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
Hodges, in which the Court struck down state bans on same-sex marriage and the recognition thereof. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
Lord Hodge (with whom Lords Clarke, Wilson and Toulson agreed) held that the licences granted to ZH and CN were not licences to occupy premises as a dwelling. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
LEACH BUILDERS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Leach Builders, LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
Her appeal was unanimously allowed by LJs Hale, Clarke, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
Mrs Braganza appealed to the Supreme Court, and the appeal was heard on 10 November 2014 by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Berg, Brief of Douglas Laycock, Thomas Berg, David Blankenhorn, Marie Failinger, and Edward Gaffney as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners in Same-Sex Marriage Cases (Obergefell v. [read post]
