Search for: "In re: FACEBOOK PRIVACY LITIGATION"
Results 61 - 80
of 753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2022, 10:32 am
So we’re now seeing the fallout of 40 years of lax enforcement. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:00 am
If the other litigants can prove that your posts could hurt your case, a judge may allow them to comb through the platforms you use. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:20 am
Privacy Court Case: Reversal of Pro-Privacy Decision In May 2015, a U.S. court surprised everyone after reversing their previous pro-privacy decision in U.S. vs. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:06 am
” * In re: Marriott International Customer Data Security Breach Litig., 2022 WL 822925 (D. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
The court explains (bolding added): social-media platforms aren’t ‘dumb pipes’: They’re not just servers and hard drives storing information or hosting blogs that anyone can access, and they’re not internet service providers reflexively transmitting data from point A to point B. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
A highly magnified view of the key area from the above screenshot: As between the webpage [the other plaintiff] viewed, sandwiched between the buttons allowing Russell to select her gender and the large green “continue” button were the same two lines of text in tiny gray front stating, “I understand and agree to the Terms and Conditions which includes mandatory arbitration and Privacy Policy. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:44 pm
You can learn more about litigating to remove fake reviews here. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
What if the parent’s post was private, but someone else re-shared images of her or her children? [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Russia, and for the first time refers to the notion of SLAPP (Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation). [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
Apple has zero governmental backing, unimpressive academic support compared to Epic, and when it comes to companies and industry bodies, we're practically talking about Apple applauding itself through astroturfing, Google indirectly backing Apple, and Roblox, which is increasingly controversial over its own treatment of creators. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:49 am
Indeed, as Mikolaj notes, the “likely result is less security and privacy, more expenses, and less innovation. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:59 am
It would also give parents the ability to delete their child’s account entirely if they’re unhappy with their use of the platform. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 10:47 am
” “Parents’ Lawsuit Against Apple for In-App Purchases by Minor Children Moves Forward — In re Apple In-App Purchase Litigation. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
-based services, such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel and Mailchimp, IAPP reports. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 7:10 am
And I am also the Chair elect for the New York State bar’s commercial and federal litigation section. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 7:27 pm
EARN IT’s Problems Aren’t an Accident, They’re the Point The bill’s issues regarding encryption and privacy (to say nothing of all the other stuff) are unlikely to be fixed, because to its sponsors, they’re not bugs, they’re features. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:00 am
Though names and details have been edited to protect the privacy of our clients, the value of the information remains. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
The Facebook accounts linked to the defendant’s YouTube channel, BBTV, which specialises in broadcasting Pidgin English in the UK and internationally. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 12:21 pm
In a 2019 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on encryption, Senator Graham—a coauthor of the EARN IT Act—told representatives from Apple and Facebook that encryption was not going to block them from access: “You’re going to find a way to do this or we’re going to go do it for you. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:21 am
Patent trolls like Personal Audio don’t make products or services themselves, but instead use their patents to threaten litigation against others, unless they get paid a patent licensing fee. [read post]
