Search for: "LANDMARK 4, LLC"
Results 61 - 80
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
(Published in Pennsylvania Law Weekly Monday, December 28, 2009)A Wild RideA multitude of landmark decisions in civil law make 2009 a year to rememberBY DANIEL E. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:17 am
(TorrentFreak) Australia Australian court denies appeal in landmark ISP liability case (TechnoLlama) (LawFont) (1709 Copyright Blog) Australia considers new digital lock exceptions (Michael Geist) Canada Update: Canadian keyword advertising (ipblog.ca) International Music Score Library Project faces renewed pressure from European publishers (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) Online agreements and forum selection – Hudye Farms v Canadian Wheat Board (ipblog.ca) Bill C-32: A lifeline… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* A landmark decision from the CJEU on private copying levies? [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Landmark Aviation, No. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court of Canada released a landmark decision today ruling that Canadian common law courts have the jurisdiction to make global de-indexing orders against search engines like Google. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 4:42 am
On December 8, 2016, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and eight media companies (American Society of News Editors, The Associated Press, Gannett Co., Inc., Landmark Media Enterprises, LLC, Online News Association, Radio Television News Association, Society of Professional Journalists, and The Washington Post) submitted an amici curia brief (“the Brief”) in support of Rolling Stone’s December 5th motion. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 4:33 pm
In 2004, the Conference agreed to sell the property to Pacific Polk Properties, LLC (“Pacific Polk”) for the construction of market rate condominiums. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 4:33 pm
In 2004, the Conference agreed to sell the property to Pacific Polk Properties, LLC (“Pacific Polk”) for the construction of market rate condominiums. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
Prognostications will include possible Supreme Court review of the Federal Circuit's 6-4 en banc decision in Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
Charles Gielen explained the unlawful and not unlawful deeds under Article 4(2-5) and Article 3 and 5. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
See In re Global Energies, LLC, 763 F.3d 1341, 1350 (11th Cir. 2014). [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:05 am
Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014), a landmark decision that dismissed indictments against two insider trading defendants. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:36 pm
Upon seeing that a LLC is a superior method of owning Hotel California, Henry and Whitney create a LLC, Acme LLC, in which Henry will have a 50% interest and Whitney will have a 50% interest. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:43 am
Like Seven Pines, Burntisland involved the post-merger valuation under BCL Section 623 of a dissenter’s small interest in a realty holding company — this time an LLC — that owns a 4-story, landmarked building leased to a private arts club under a long-term, triple net lease. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
Otherwise, PLLCs are governed by the same provisions of New York’s LLC Law applicable to non-professional LLCs. [read post]
22 May 2023, 10:58 am
(§ 15126.4(a)(4).) [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The much-anticipated decision in NT 1 & NT 2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) was handed down on 13 April 2018. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:01 am
The relatively small number of reported § 1118 cases in which courts have departed from the 9% statutory rate include Giaimo v Vitale (4%), Matter of Whalen (4%), Matter of Bambu Sales, Inc. (5.75%), and Matter of Fleischer (12%) — none of which explained how the court arrived at the chosen rate. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
-based Center for Food Safety and the Oakland, CA-based Center for Environmental Health, that alleged the government agencies were not complying with an important food safety timetable. 2019-06-07–doc-33-1–consent-decree_35775 In the complaint, which was filed in October 2018, the two groups said the government agencies weren’t implementing rules in the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), a landmark law signed by President Barack Obama on Jan. 4, 2011. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
