Search for: "Land Road Transfer Co"
Results 61 - 80
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
Kalamazoo County Road Commission v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
” Twice-rescheduled Dean Foods Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:59 am
One night last fall, he discovered via Facebook that a friend of a friend was planning with some co-conspirators to break in to his home. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He is co-author of Patrimoine culturel et créations contemporaines and of Vol. 35, No. 2 of the Journal of International Affairs on the New World Information Order. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:04 am
Completion of the subdivision was conditional upon the construction of roads enabling access to the lots. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
Fairhold Mercury Ltd v HQ (Block 1) Action Management Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 487 (LC)Fairhold (Yorkshire) Ltd v Trinity Wharf (SE16) RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 502 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 7 Sunny Gardens RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 509 (LC)No.1 Deansgate (Residential) Ltd v No.1 Deansgate RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 580 (LC)Pineview Ltd v 83 Crampton Street RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 598 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 13-24 Romside Place RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 603 (LC)Ninety… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
Fairhold Mercury Ltd v HQ (Block 1) Action Management Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 487 (LC)Fairhold (Yorkshire) Ltd v Trinity Wharf (SE16) RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 502 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 7 Sunny Gardens RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 509 (LC)No.1 Deansgate (Residential) Ltd v No.1 Deansgate RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 580 (LC)Pineview Ltd v 83 Crampton Street RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 598 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 13-24 Romside Place RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 603 (LC)Ninety… [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 7:28 am
Regarding the casino, Manale said the city approved land use rights for 'a place of amusement'. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
The dissent acknowledges that “[t]he majority extends Nollan and Dolan to cases in which the government conditions a permit not on the transfer of real property, but instead on the payment or expenditure of money. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Shepherd signed and gave to Mendelsohn the required transfer papers and the only set of keys. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 10:11 pm
Lautenberg’s stand against the liquor lobby has made America’s roads safer and saved countless lives. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:11 am
Canwell Estate Co Ltd v Smith Brothers Farms Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 237; [2012] WLR (D) 59 “The prohibition introduced by the Rentcharges Act 1977 against creation of new rentcharges by a rent owner against a landowner did not apply to the creation of a rentcharge incorporated in a transfer made in 1990 the amount of which was calculated annually as a fixed proportion of the claimant’s costs, expenses and outgoings incurred in fulfilling its obligations under a covenant to… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:12 pm
The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing sets provincial planning requirements, including land use planning. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
Your inventory should also serve as a road map to other areas where your skills and experience would transfer. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Otsego Co.), the plaintiff corporate landowner entered into two leases in 2007 granting the lessee the right to explore, develop, produce and market oil and gas resources on approximately 380 acres of plaintiff’s land. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
Then the UT(LC) would, I suspect, take a more generous approach.The second case is Assethold Ltd v 15 Yonge Park RTM Co Ltd [2011] UKUT 39 (LC), in which the UT(LC) appears to be saying that an earlier decision of its (Moskovitz v 75 Worple Road RTM Co Ltd [2010] UKUT 393 (LC)), was wrongly decided. [read post]
