Search for: "Li v. Holder"
Results 61 - 80
of 446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2021, 2:22 pm
Justice Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion in BP p.l.c. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm
This means the authenticity, provenance, and scarcity of an NFT can be validated, and therein lies much of the allure and interest in NFTs—the verified authenticity of a unique digital asset. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:00 am
Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009)). [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:14 am
Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009)). [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
To my mind, this is a lesser evil, compared to a complete bar, which would mean that parties have one shot at challenging a patent, and should they fail, the patent holder gains a product monopoly. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
To my mind, this is a lesser evil, compared to a complete bar, which would mean that parties have one shot at challenging a patent, and should they fail, the patent holder gains a product monopoly. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
To my mind, this is a lesser evil, compared to a complete bar, which would mean that parties have one shot at challenging a patent, and should they fail, the patent holder gains a product monopoly. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
To my mind, this is a lesser evil, compared to a complete bar, which would mean that parties have one shot at challenging a patent, and should they fail, the patent holder gains a product monopoly. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
In Garcetti v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 11:49 am
In other words, the purpose of such a bond is “as a vehicle for protecting the property holders just as the lis pendens protects the plaintiff and third parties. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 2:38 pm
They differ substantially from copyright scenarios because of the absence of holders of large right portfolios who could trigger a snowball effect by notifying long lists of protected subject matter. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
After Bush v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
[ii] Smart contracts have already been used in connection with real estate transactions,[iii] bank bonds,[iv] interbank transfers,[v] invoice financing,[vi] and homeowners, renters, pet, and flight-delay insurance. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument Wednesday in Pereida v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:17 am
Four-Year Statute of Limitations The distinction was addressed in the leading case of Dubin v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:34 am
Regarding the right of publicity, claims that interfere with a copyright holder's exercise of the rights afforded under the Copyright Act are preempted unless the claim serves a serves a distinct state interest. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:43 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
In recent years, two unfortunate trends have converged in cybersecurity—the growth of child pornography distributed online and the proliferation of encryption systems that enable the distribution of all forms of content (both lawful and illicit) in a manner that is inaccessible to service providers and secure from observation and interception by law enforcement. [read post]
