Search for: "Maine Employee Rights Group" Results 61 - 80 of 2,048
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2023, 3:39 am by Jon Hyman
An employer terminates a group of 14 employees within six weeks after learning that they were discussing unionizing. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:05 am by centerforartlaw
The NACP employees are members of the International Working Group on Sanctions against Russia (Yermak-McFaul Group), established at the initiative of the President of Ukraine. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Martin’s official title with the group is outreach and development director. [read post]
Under the relevant law, at least 1.5% of a firm’s total number of employees must be disabled persons. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:07 am by CMS
S.146 states that a worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by their employer for the sole or main purpose of preventing or deterring the worker from taking part in the activities of an independent trade union at an appropriate time. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am by Bob Ambrogi
Diversity: Over the past two consecutive summers, we have hired a total of three students from the University of Calgary Law School Innovation Program, two of whom identify as coming from an under-represented group (women studying science, technology, engineering and math), indigenous students, visible minorities, new Canadians (within 5 years), and persons with disabilities. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
The group sang, uninvited, a penitential plainsong chant; a statement was then read out, and the group prayed prior to departing. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Could Abortion Rights Rescue Red-State Democrats in the Senate? [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:58 am by Amy Howe
There are two main questions before the court. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 12:30 am by Dennis Dimka
It’s organized by employee and employer, with a ton of content available for each client group. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 7:44 am by Eugene Volokh
In war, civilians pay for the sins of their governments, and the prospect of civilian deaths is often the main deterrent to aggression, or the main impetus to surrender; that's just the way it is. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Members of Congress, particularly Democrats, have long raised concerns that lobbying groups and other organizations use coordinated groups of amicus briefs to push courts toward favorable rulings. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 3:40 am by INFORRM
Assistant General Manager HRMDecision Date: August 8, 2023 The Madras High Court quashed the misconduct charges framed against an employee for posting a message in a private WhatsApp Group, as it was protected under the right to freedom of speech and expression. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
All nine justices seemed to acknowledge the challenge and importance of defining when government employees are acting in an official capacity online, and therefore bound by First Amendment restrictions on censorship; and when they are acting as private citizens, with their own individual free speech rights. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 5:00 pm by Lisa S. Boehm
The program administrator for MERIT, not the Covered Employer, is responsible for notifying Covered Employees of their rights and obligations under MERIT, including the right to opt out of payroll deduction contributions, the default contribution rate and their right to choose a different rate, their right to opt out of automatic escalation, and their right to direct the investment of their payroll deduction contributions among the investment… [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
 Such candies include the main active ingredient linked to the psychedelic effects of cannabis – the plant from which marijuana is derived. [read post]
Mark Wiletsky is a partner in and practice group leader for Holland & Hart LLP’s labor and employment practice group. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Alexander Gelfond
(Id. at 140).ConclusionWe await the final rule and the FTC discussion of the comments and other materials in the rulemaking record.[1] Section 5.02(d) of the Employment Restatement provides that employers are subject to liability under the “public policy” tort, recognized in most states, for retaliating against job applicants and employees who “refuse[] to waive a nonnegotiable or nonwaivable right as a condition of employment”.[2] Matthew Johnson, Kurt… [read post]