Search for: "May v. United States, The et al" Results 61 - 80 of 3,926
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The ABA Business Law Section Backgrounder may be accessed HERE. 1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMANORTHEASTERN DIVISIONNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS )UNITED, d/b/a the NATIONAL )SMALL BUSINESS )ASSOCIATION, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB)JANET YELLEN, in her official )capacity as Secretary of the )Treasury, et al., ))Defendants. )MEMORANDUM OPINIONThe late Justice Antonin Scalia once… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:16 am by Courtney Finerty-Stelzner
On June 23, 2022, the United States Supreme Court, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Subsequently, on or about September 6, 2012, defendant filed a discrimination lawsuit on plaintiff’s behalf in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen v Chanel, Inc., et al., 12-cv-6758 (LAP). [read post]
By: Sofia Ellington On January 18th, 2024, The Washington Supreme Court came to the University of Washington School of Law to hear oral arguments in the case of Greenberg, et al. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:29 am by Silver Law Group
UBS Securities LLC et al., case number 22-660, before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely:  He didn’t devote any space to it.[1]  His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
As officers and legislators are mutually exclusive terms under the Amars' global officer/legislator distinction, a Section 3 barred defendant may hold a state legislative seat. [read post]