Search for: "Modification Review Board"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2023, 11:41 am
Employers should take note of these modifications, ensuring that they are fully informed and prepared for the changes coming into effect Oct. 1, 2023. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 8:52 am
The cybersecurity audit would need to be reported to the business’s board of directors or governing body, or if no such board or equivalent body exists, to the highest-ranking executive in the business responsible for the business’s cybersecurity program. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 8:17 am
At the meeting, the Board considered additional requirements for risk assessments, including: Relevant internal actors and external parties contributing to the assessment; Any internal or external audit conducted in relation to the assessment, including, the name of the auditor, the names and positions of individuals involved in the review process, and the details of the audit process; and Dates the assessment was reviewed and approved, and names, positions, and… [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 11:08 am
What if you could go a step further and instantly generate a board of advisors tailored to your unique needs? [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 7:00 am
We have reviewed those grounds and conclude that none of them disclose reviewable error. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:24 am
The Appeals Board first describes the procedural posture of this case and indicates on its current decision that it is adopting and incorporating its original decision in Nunes I, without any changes or modifications. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm
LLC, 372 NLRB No. 310 (Aug 25, 2023), created a new standard that essentially revived the dormant Joy Silk Mills doctrine with some modifications, thus allowing unions to achieve recognition as the certified bargaining representative of employees without requiring a formal NLRB secret-ballot election. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 8:50 am
One of the first regulatory dates of note in September is the freeze on FM translator modification applications that goes into effect on September 1 in anticipation of the LPFM window. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 4:04 pm
Treasury is leading consultation, and the Australian Accounting Standards Board will be responsible for establishing the detailed disclosure standards. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:30 am
In addition, budget modifications totaling $3.2 million were not recorded in the accounting records. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:30 am
In addition, budget modifications totaling $3.2 million were not recorded in the accounting records. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 7:13 am
The statute then exempts any such software that enables the health care professional “to independently review the basis for such recommendations that such software presents so that it is not the intent that such health care professional rely primarily on any of such recommendations to make a clinical diagnosis or treatment decision regarding an individual patient. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:34 am
Review and update your governing documents and policies. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Adriana Kugler to be a governor on the Federal Reserve Board. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:05 am
Reviewing the practices of other communities in the United States, primarily the Jewish community, I saw a template for dispute resolution that we as Muslims living in the U.S. could adopt with modifications. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
Cir. 2005) (internalquotation marks omitted) (modifications in the original). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Before a cyber incident occurs, companies should carefully review their cyber and D&O policies to determine what claims may be covered and consider modifications to strengthen coverage, narrow exclusions and maximize changes of recovery should a claim arise. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:51 pm
The post Case Review – Bird Construction Group v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Board of Education decision. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
Close review is needed 'to ferret out classifications in reality malign, but masquerading as benign,' Adarand, 515 U.S., at 275 (Ginsburg, J., dissenting), and to 'ensure that preferences are not so large as to trammel unduly upon the opportunities of others or interfere too harshly with legitimate expectations of persons in once-preferred groups.'" The Harvard and UNC policies can't possibly survive a genuine "careful judicial inspection. [read post]
