Search for: "New Generation Computing, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 3,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2016, 6:37 am by Lax & Neville LLP
(“Paxton”), in connection with generating stock sales through misleading statements about allegedly revolutionary computer technology and a flurry of orders for the technology by well known businesses. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 10:07 pm by Cameron Harvey (AU)
Kiefel CJ, Gageler and Keane JJ (the Kiefel CJ plurality) held that Aristocrat’s appeal should be dismissed, on the basis that the invention failed to claim some variation or adjustment to generic computer technology so as to give effect to the new game. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 10:07 pm by Cameron Harvey (AU)
Kiefel CJ, Gageler and Keane JJ (the Kiefel CJ plurality) held that Aristocrat’s appeal should be dismissed, on the basis that the invention failed to claim some variation or adjustment to generic computer technology so as to give effect to the new game. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 8:18 pm
Category: 101   By: Eric Paul Smith, Contributor    TitleUltramercial, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 7:29 am by Steve Brachmann
Patent and Trademark Office publishes patent applications, and computer and electronics developer Apple Inc. always has at least a few published patent applications. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
Over two and a half years ago, this column analyzed a Ninth Circuit case titled HiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:31 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 5,778,372 (the ‘372 patent), 5,889,522 (the ‘522 patent), 6,339,780 (the ‘780 patent), 6,891,551 (the ‘551 patent), and 6,957,233 (the ‘233 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York barnesandnoble.com LLC of New York, New York Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. of Taiwan Foxconn Electronics, Inc. of Taiwan Foxconn Precision Component… [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
 In that case, a civil action,the court unequivocally held that `[t]he general purpose of the [Computer Fraud and Abuse Act] ‘was to create a cause of action against computer hackers (e.g., electronic trespassers). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:50 am by Steve Brachmann
Apple Inc. is always applying for protections on different device designs and computer systems. [read post]