Search for: "Nine Group II, LLC"
Results 61 - 80
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
Cir. 2000) (denying enforcement of Teamsters Local 166 (Dyncorp Support Services), 327 NLRB 950 (1990)(Dyncorp I), decision upon remand, 333 NLRB 1145 (2001)(Dyncorp II)), the D.C. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
This Newsletter also appears as a post on our website Taber Law Group every Monday. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
When historians look back at the copyright worlf in 2017 (if our attention spans allow us to have roles such as a 'historian' in the future!) [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
II. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
EPA’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at EPA Region II, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007–1866. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
It identifies Defendants’ list of factors as some of the nine factors or lenses that guide epidemiologists in making judgments about causation. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
PAGE 2 of appeals held that attorney immunity barred all of Bethel’s claims.2 II Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a provides that a party “may move to dismiss a cause of action on the grounds that it has no basis in law or fact. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself: see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9] A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (IP tango), China: Pfizer loses trade mark action against Jaingsu Lianhuan Pharmaceutical Co over 3D mark: (Rouse & Co International), India: More patents for new forms issued to generics: (Patent Circle), India: Gauri Kamath on drug ‘differential pricing’ in India: (Spicy IP), Mexico: Revised health supplies regulations promise changes for generics: (International Law Office), US: World drug pricing crisis: Congressmen criticise US Trade Representative over Special 301… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
This Newsletter also appears as a post on our website Taber Law Group every Monday. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:40 am
R&R Venture Grp., LLC, 2015 U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 11:31 am
II. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Ghana Victor Tieku to develop new copyright collecting org in Ghana (Afro-IP) India Bombay HC rules on copyright in drawings: Part II: Indiana Gratings v Anand Udyog (Spicy IP) Delay in filing power of attorney: Does it prejudice a patent application? [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Marvel Entertainment, LLC, 576 U. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
The subpoena requested nine groups of documents related to Langford's net worth as well as the financial position of StaxxRing. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 8:14 am
Chapter II: A Mixed AdvanceThe SCOV’s second area of review takes up the argument that money advanced by the Bank in 2006 should not take priority over the Creditor’s liens. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, involving the constitutionality of inter partes review. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
If the Secretary has shown violations of regulations involving Class II work and the presence of asbestos, the burden shifts to the employer to show that the violations were not "serious. [read post]
