Search for: "OTHER DOE ENTITIES 1-30" Results 61 - 80 of 3,809
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2020, 7:29 am by Woodrow Pollack
Notably, the extension does not apply to original filing deadlines, PCT deadlines, national stage filing deadlines, non-provisional filing deadlines, or the deadlines to file an inter partes review petition.The USPTO previously extended by 30 days deadlines for certain events that fall between March 27, 2020 and April 30, 2020, if the applicant includes a statement that the delay in filing or payment was due to the COVID-19 outbreak. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:29 am by Woodrow Pollack
Notably, the extension does not apply to original filing deadlines, PCT deadlines, national stage filing deadlines, non-provisional filing deadlines, or the deadlines to file an inter partes review petition.The USPTO previously extended by 30 days deadlines for certain events that fall between March 27, 2020 and April 30, 2020, if the applicant includes a statement that the delay in filing or payment was due to the COVID-19 outbreak. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by Gabriel Chin
” Sineneng-Smith also argues that Section 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) must be interpreted in light of the other prohibitions in the same section. 8 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:01 pm
  ARRTA temporarily suspends this disallowance for exchanges or modifications after September 1, 2008 and before December 31, 2008, provided the old debt itself was not a high-yield discount obligation, does not have contingent interest, and is not held by a person related to the issuer. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:01 pm
  ARRTA temporarily suspends this disallowance for exchanges or modifications after September 1, 2008 and before December 31, 2008, provided the old debt itself was not a high-yield discount obligation, does not have contingent interest, and is not held by a person related to the issuer. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:28 pm by PJ Blount
Paragraph (a) does not prevent or limit the liability 41 of a spaceflight entity if the spaceflight entity does any one 42 or more of the following: 43 1.? [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., LLC v Fox Rothschild LLP  2018 NY Slip Op 32451(U)  October 1, 2018  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 158900/2017  Judge Saliann Scarpulla determines that one of the entities has no privity (and therefore no case) while the other can (for now) state a cause of action. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[8] The term “foreign country of concern” includes China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, the Maduro Regime of Venezuela, and Syria, as well as “any agency of or any other entity of significant control of such foreign country of concern. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Question #1: Why didn’t the court enforce the forum selection clause? [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Question #1: Why didn’t the court enforce the forum selection clause? [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” In other words, said the court, the Moratorium Statute “does not permit an employer to whom the statute applies to provide retirees with lesser health insurance benefits than active employees. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 11:10 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Rivers, Director of the Employee Benefit Security Administration Office of Health Plan Standards and Compliance will discuss these and other risks during the “Department of Labor Health Plan Compliance and Enforcement Update” at a virtual program hosted by the American Bar Association Joint Committee on Employee Benefits from Noon to 1:30 p.m. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:42 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 In this regard, the 5/5 Guidance states, As explained in prior guidance,1 HIPAA does not permit covered health care providers to give the media, including film crews, access to any areas of their facilities where patients’ PHI will be accessible in any form (e.g., written, electronic, oral, or other visual or audio form), without first obtaining a written HIPAA authorization from each patient whose PHI would be accessible to the media. 2 Additionally, covered… [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:29 am by John Jascob
” Absent relief, the application explained, the office would be required to register under Advisers Act Sec. 203(a), even though it does not hold itself out to the public as an investment adviser or market non-public offerings to any person or entity other than family clients. [read post]