Search for: "PR Administration of Corrections"
Results 61 - 80
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
The correct analytical approach is to determine whether the termination provisions in an employment agreement read as a whole violate the ESA. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Sullivan, 2020 ONCA 333 (CanLII) [42] The trial judge was correct in finding s. 33.1 to be in prima facie violation of both ss. 7 and 11(d) of the Charter. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 11:28 am
Corrective actions were ignored at the Source. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:57 am
The PR Secretary of Labor also directs employers to be cognizant of and address the possible risks and effects of the “sick building syndrome” and the air quality inside some buildings that have been closed or partially functioning for long periods of time as these risks could set back efforts to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Au fil du temps, elle prendra les contours d’une véritable catastrophe régionale et causera préjudice à des centaines voire des milliers de citoyens de la région de Trois‑Rivières. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 7:10 am
Additional guidance on protected activities is available on the Occupational Health and Safety Administration’s website. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Confidence in the administration of justice would rapidly be lost if either extreme was considered appropriate. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 10:16 am
It is reported that one of the first federal employees to test positive for COVID-19 works at the Grand Prairie, Texas administrative facility. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 3:24 pm
On March 6, 2020, President Trump signed a spending bill approving $8.3 billion to be used in part to develop treatments for the disease, such as vaccines, and purchase medical supplies.[4] President Trump later announced a state of emergency on March 13, 2020, authorizing him to use up to $50 billion to combat the disease.[5] President Trump also signed a bill on March 18, 2020 releasing billions of dollars to help businesses provide paid leave benefits, bolster unemployment… [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:16 am
PRS for DWI offenders should have the following elements: a. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Vavilov, 2019 CSC 65 [1] Le présent pourvoi et les pourvois connexes (voir Bell Canada c. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:13 am
Regardless of all the changes in the investment management space, year-end administrative upkeep and 2020 planning are always particularly important, especially for general counsels, Chief Compliance Officers (“CCOs”), and key operations personnel. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 10:14 am
This is an underlying factor in almost every instance of non‐compliance and makes it difficult for Jail Administrators to manage and operate a jail. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 3:59 am
Décision L’AMP est visée par la Loi sur la justice administrative. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
But ignoring the need for corrective measures is also inappropriate, and returning unpaid money to culpable defendants undermines the function of class actions in enforcing the law and deterring wrongdoing. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
., en se présentant à une bibliothèque municipale. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court has made it clear that administrative bodies must be correct in their determination as to the scope of their delegated authority because jurisdictional questions are fundamentally tied to both the maintenance of legislative supremacy and the rule of law: See Crevier v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Admission of the fruits of that conduct would bring the administration of justice into disrepute. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
In decision T 315/03 (relating to what has become Rule 28(1)(d) EPC) theBoard fully acknowledged the Administrative Council’s competence to interpretArticle 53(a) EPC by amendment to the Implementing Regulations based onArticle 33(1)(c) EPC without being limited in this regard by an interpretation ofthe Article set forth in earlier case law.10. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
” At The Daily Signal, Elizabeth Slattery argues that “it’s time for the court to correct its mistake and make clear that judges—not agency officials —say what the law is. [read post]
