Search for: "People v. Moore (1994)" Results 61 - 80 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
Moore, 22 F.3d 241 (10th Cir. 1994,) which states: "The proponent of a motion to suppress bears the burden of proof. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
AmClyde, 511 U.S. 202 (1994), and Boca Grande Club, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Kirby Inland Marine Inc., 482 F.3d 347, 351 (5th Cir. 2007); Moore v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
                    Introduction  There is an ongoing debate among the media and cheer world as to whether or not cheerleading should be recognized as a sport under Title IX.[1] A recent poll found that 60% of people thought cheerleading was a sport, while 35% did not.[2] Cheerleaders sometimes argue for this… [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
In many way, this case is similar to Moore v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Copyright protection expiration in China: lifetime plus fifty (IP Dragon) EU experience and practice must show China the way concerning IPR protection at exhibitions (IP Dragon) Comparison between IPR in China relevant provisions of Foreign Trade Law 2004 and 1994 (IP Dragon) Thesis and publications about IPR in China (IP Dragon) 2009: New trends in China’s judicial protection of intellectual property rights (China Law Insight) Best practices in technology transfer and IP… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
App. 1979) (a federal decision supports case-by-case).Iowa: Moore v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Peoples    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0309p.06 2008/08/22 Clemmer v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Moore, No. 07-3434 Denial of an application for habeas corpus from a conviction and sentence for gross sexual imposition and rape is affirmed where petitioner's Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy was not violated because the requisite high degree of necessity existed for a mistrial. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]