Search for: "Pete Olson"
Results 61 - 80
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 4:42 am
Pete Olson (R-TX) sent last week to Rep. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 4:12 am
Sandy Adams (R-FL) and Pete Olson (R-TX) asked Rep. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Pete Olson (R-TX), whose district includes JSC. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:10 am
Pete Olson (R-TX), who told Houston TV station KTRK that “it’s still a fight” over whether NASA gets sufficient funding, suggesting yet again that money be taken from NASA earth sciences programs to pay for the shuttle mission, should it come to that. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 7:36 pm
Pete Olson (R-TX) to transfer $517 million of NASA funding from the agency’s climate change research to human spaceflight, continuing a recent theme by Olson and several other members. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:56 am
Pete Olson (R-Texas), Bill Posey (R-Fla.), Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), Sandy Adams (R-Fla.), Rob Bishop (R-Utah) and Mo Brooks (R-Ala.). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:49 pm
Pete Olson (R-TX) criticized the budget’s perceived emphasis on climate change research over human spaceflight and said he had a solution: I have a plan to preserve the human space flight budget by transferring money from NASA’s unneeded climate research programs, while keeping NASA’s overall budget at 2008 levels. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:04 am
Bill Posey (R-FL), Pete Olson (R-TX), Rob Bishop (R-UT), Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), Sandy Adams (R-FL), and Mo Brooks (R-AL)—argue. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:39 am
Pete Olson (R-TX), whose district includes JSC. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 6:37 am
Pete Olson (R-TX) and Frank Wolf (R-VA), the likely new chairs of the House Science Committee’s space subcommittee and House Appropriations Committee CJS subcommittee respectively, as likely opponents, although neither provide any comments to the newspaper suggesting they would oppose such a test. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:52 am
Ralph Hall (R-TX) and Pete Olson (R-TX), the ranking members of the full House Science and Technology Committee and its space subcommittee, respectively, are expected to win easily, and would be in line to chair those committees assuming Republicans to gain control of the House tonight. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 4:16 pm
“This is a viciousness in the workplace that we need to stop,” Olson said. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:55 pm
Late Friday committee leadership, including Gordon, ranking member Ralph Hall (R-TX), space subcommittee chair Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ), and subcommittee ranking member Pete Olson (R-TX), sent letters to the key members of the appropriations committees in the Senate and House outlining their views on what the committees should do to provide “further clarification and direction” to the language in the authorization bill. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 3:31 am
Pete Olson and Gene Green to discuss the bill.) [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:00 am
Pete Olson (R-TX) expressed his “strong support” for the bill, showing no sign in the statement that he might have preferred the original House version. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:00 am
Pete Olson (R-TX) expressed his “strong support” for the bill, showing no sign in the statement that he might have preferred the original House version. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 7:20 pm
Bart Gordon (D-TN), Ralph Hall (R-TX), and Pete Olson (R-TX), were reluctantly in favor of the bill, saying it wasn’t perfect but it was better than none at all. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 7:20 pm
Bart Gordon (D-TN), Ralph Hall (R-TX), and Pete Olson (R-TX), were reluctantly in favor of the bill, saying it wasn’t perfect but it was better than none at all. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 4:21 am
Pete Olson (R-TX), who this weekend published an op-ed in the Houston Chronicle supporting the compromise House version, told the paper now that it was more important to “end the uncertainty” facing NASA and its employees and contractors. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 4:21 am
Pete Olson (R-TX), who this weekend published an op-ed in the Houston Chronicle supporting the compromise House version, told the paper now that it was more important to “end the uncertainty” facing NASA and its employees and contractors. [read post]
