Search for: "Pom LLC"
Results 61 - 80
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2015, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld claims of false advertising by POM Wonderful LLC (“POM Wonderful”), finding that the government could prohibit the pomegranate juice company from advertising its products as being effective in fighting heart disease, prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld claims of false advertising by POM Wonderful LLC (“POM Wonderful”), finding that the government could prohibit the pomegranate juice company from advertising its products as being effective in fighting heart disease, prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld claims of false advertising by POM Wonderful LLC (“POM Wonderful”), finding that the government could prohibit the pomegranate juice company from advertising its products as being effective in fighting heart disease, prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 8:59 am
POM Wonderful, LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 30 [week ending Sunday 18 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for vacuum cleaners in Case… [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
Circuit issued its opinion in POM Wonderful, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
. so that it is administratively feasible to determine whether a particular person is a class member”); In re POM Wonderful LLC, 2014 WL 1225184, at *6 (C.D. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
Circuit Court of Appeals on 30 December, Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, No. 14-55253. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:27 am
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
We at the DDLaw blog wish all our readers a Happy New Year as 2014 recedes inexorably into our rear-view mirror. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:18 am
FINRA found that LSCM, a third-party, reviewed the Seat Exchange offering including the private offering memorandum (POM). [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:14 am
Haakenson found home improvement giant Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC guilty of false advertising. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:14 am
Haakenson found home improvement giant Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC guilty of false advertising. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 9:48 am
Earlier this year, in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
JHP Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:29 pm
” Observing that “[t]he FDA allows the manufacturer to make this decision in the first instance,” 2014 WL 3536573, at *3, the court refused to be drawn into the thicket of making safety and effectiveness decisions under the guise of Lanham Act enforcement.As one would expect, the plaintiff argued that this allegation was allowed under POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
