Search for: "Power v. Internal Revenue Service"
Results 61 - 80
of 822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2012, 12:16 pm
Before the contracts between LIPA and PSEG become effective, regulatory approvals are required from the Internal Revenue Service, the NYS Attorney General and the Office of the State Comptroller. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
Department of Revenue of Ill., 386 U. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Oregon, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue was not within his wheelhouse when he regulated health care tax credits in King v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:52 am
In Pollock v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
This prevents taxation powers arising incidentally in delegated legislation. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:39 pm
IRS Abuses Power in Targeting Tea Party The extraordinary revelation this week that the Internal Revenue Service targeted tea party groups for more aggressive enforcement highlights exactly why caution is needed in any response to the much-vilified Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am
In light of the Supreme Court’s admonition against issuing “unnecessary constitutional rulings” (American Foreign Service Association v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellee. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
For example, almost all persons eventually consume some health care services. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:22 pm
EDIAS Software Intern. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Code: USC Title 26—Internal Revenue Code Subtitle D: Miscellaneous Excise Taxes CHAPTER 48—MAINTENANCE OF MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE§ 5000A. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
It explains how the individual mandate is enforced by the Internal Revenue Service through tax penalties, argues that the Anti-Injunction Act is jurisdictional so that the executive branch’s decision to waive reliance on it was irrelevant, and contends that the Anti-Injunction Act applies because, even though the payments for violating the individual mandate are labeled “penalties” and not “taxes,” some penalties are subject to the… [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:52 am
Access Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
Windsor paid $363,053 in estate taxes and sought a refund, which the Internal Revenue Service denied. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:43 am
Similarly, in Appalachian Power Co. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am
In fact, Alan Morrison submitted an amicus brief on behalf of two former commissioners of the Internal Revenue Service, arguing that the AIA should apply. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:59 pm
International cooperation. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 8:02 am
To hold otherwise would defeat the purpose of the DMCA and render the statute internally inconsistent. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
In defense, respondent alleged the six-year limitation period provided in the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
In defense, respondent alleged the six-year limitation period provided in the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
