Search for: "Precise Voting, LLC." Results 61 - 80 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Planning Landscape – Post ATRA Estate, business and succession planning changed dramatically with the enactment of the American Taxpayer Relief Act (ATRA) in early 2013. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:50 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
  The Court acknowledged that no party argued that DGCL Section 141(d) or the Airgas Charter required that the three-year terms be measured with mathematical precision. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
" (It's again interesting to note that Justice David Friedman wrote both of the First Department opinions upheld by the Court of Appeals in Centro and Arfa, while Justice Helen Freedman voted with the majority in Centro.) [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:42 am by SHG
  Copyright © 2015 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
§ 1-7-114(2) (“A vote for a write-in candidate shall not be counted unless that candidate is qualified to hold the office for which the elector's vote was cast. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
I don’t know precisely what Sessions is referring to here. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 12:39 am
[Editor: this begs the question of how precise is precise enough to be reasonable.] [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:39 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Also of significance to employers were the opinions penned by Justice Scalia for the 5 – 4 majorities of the Supreme Court in ATT Mobility LLC v Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011), here,  and American Express Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
In short, the “ultimate jurisdictional issue” is “precisely the same as the ultimate issue on the merits. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
', Lars Brahms looks at the recent England and Wales High Court decision of Vestel Elektronik Sanayi v HEVC Advance LLC, which raised this question as well as the questions of what the proper basis would be for such a claim, and where this claim might be brought.Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic examines an intriguing decision from the General Court, which stated that the relevant public's attention is 'average at best' when assessing likelihood of confusion… [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 8:21 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Coburn nonetheless urged postponement of the vote:     We should wait for this investigation to be completed. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In the case of BT Holdings, LLC v Village of Chester, the Circuit Court found that the District Court properly dismissed the claim, pursuant to 42 USC §1983, as there had not been a final determination with respect to whether the property owner could utilize its property. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In the case of BT Holdings, LLC v Village of Chester, the Circuit Court found that the District Court properly dismissed the claim, pursuant to 42 USC §1983, as there had not been a final determination with respect to whether the property owner could utilize its property. [read post]
12 May 2008, 5:15 am
But, Appellants argue “injury” is precisely the “infirmity” of being regulated by Board members who have not been appointed in a constitutional manner because they were selected by all of the Commissioners, rather than just the Chairman. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 1:57 pm by John Stigi
KKR Financial Holdings, LLC, 125 A.3d 304, 309 (Del. 2015), holding that “[w]hen a transaction not subject to the entire fairness standard is approved by a fully informed, uncoerced vote of the disinterested stockholders, the business judgment rule applies. [read post]