Search for: "Pro-Football, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am
Representing the Rutherford Institute, they filed an amicus brief in this case in the Federal Circuit and a brief in Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:08 pm
Riddell Sports, Inc. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:45 am
Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 2:49 pm
Pro Football, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:39 am
Pro Football, Inc., Cancellation No. 92046185. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:39 pm
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2016lr.htmlHere are the articles featured this week: Offensive linemen: How Pro Football, Inc.'s responses to the cancellation of the Redskins registrations should be incorporated into the USPTO's future analyses of disparaging trademarks.Addressing the Oliphant in the room: Domestic violence and the safety of American Indian and Alaska Native children in Indian Country.U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 3:16 pm
Urban Outfitters, Inc. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am
— American Needle, Inc., a maker of sports hats, uniforms and other apparel. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 9:08 am
Open, lacrosse officials, pro football cheerleaders, and basketball arena crew members including camera, audiotape, and replay operators, to name just a few. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 12:00 am
The Court denied the extraordinary request for “certiorari before judgment” presented by Pro-Football Inc. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 10:33 am
The college football and basketball numbers also are interesting. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:53 am
Films, Inc., --- F.3d ----, 2008 WL 4138462 (3rd Cir.) [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:59 pm
The new case is Pro Football, Inc., v. [read post]
When Will We Give Up the Charade That Numbers Are Copyrightable?--National Football Scouting v. Rang
19 Dec 2012, 9:12 am
By Eric Goldman National Football Scouting, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 1:15 pm
Pro-Football, Inc. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:51 am
Gone with a Federal Communications Commission plea, which the Court denied, was a $550,000 fine on the network for the fleeting exposure of one of performer Janet Jackson’s breasts during the half-time show at the Super Bowl (a pro football game) in early February 2004. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
" Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has declined to review a lower court decision (pdf download) in Pro Football, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:36 pm
Pro Football, Inc., No. 09-1021, slip op. at 3-4 (4th Cir. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:33 am
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:49 am
Pro-Football, Inc), previously reported on by Gibbons, which culminated the legal effort by Native American tribes to delineate the term “redskin” as an offensive and disparaging racial slur, resulting in the initial cancellation of the eponymous mark owned by the Washington Redskins. [read post]
