Search for: "Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
Second, are post-sale restrictions allowed, or does the Supreme Court’s ruling in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am by LTA-Editor
LG Electronics, Inc. overruled the Federal Circuit’s precedent Mallinckrodt Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:10 am
LG ELECTRONICS, INC. | Questions Presented 06-1037 KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYS., ET AL. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
LG Electronics, Inc., 553 U.S. 617 (2008). [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
Both Judge Dyk and Hughes dissented from the judgment, raising opposing views on both the applicability of Mallinckrodt and Jazz Photo.In their view, in relation to the first argument of patent exhaustion, the decision in Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc. applies, which sets out that "...the initial authorized sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item". [read post]