Search for: "Rapanos v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2020, 11:19 am
Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 pm
United States, narrowly construing the “waters of the United States” protected by the Clean Water Act.) [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
The Court of Appeal affirmed the District Court’s adoption of the plurality view of the “Waters of the United States” in Rapanos v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 10:13 am
Supreme Court (“Supreme Court”) cases ending with Rapanos v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:21 pm
Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:54 pm
The definition is based on a plurality opinion written by the late Justice Antonin Scalia in the Supreme Court’ Rapanos v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 7:25 am
Twenty-nine amici, including the United States, offer their perspectives. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 12:28 pm
The justices in the Rapanos v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm
Supreme Court has taken up the issue on multiple occasions, perhaps most significantly in Rapanos v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm
Supreme Court has taken up the issue on multiple occasions, perhaps most significantly in Rapanos v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
” Further, in Rapanos v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am
Its aim was to add technical specificity to Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test set forth in Rapanos v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:23 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:27 am
The first was Rapanos v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
” Additional coverage of the solicitor general’s motion in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
United States also centers on how lower courts interpret fractured Supreme Court decisions in which five of the court’s nine justices fail to come to an agreement,” such as “Rapanos v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
