Search for: "Rick Horowitz" Results 61 - 80 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2012, 11:38 am by Rick
Imagine the fun with Godwin's Law there. ;)January 4, 2012, Keep Shooting Each Other | RHDefense: The Law Office of Rick Horowitz writes: [...] right, Scott Greenfield. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm by Rick
They just pissed me off and made me want to fight that much more.)January 9, 2012, The Importance of History for Freedom | RHDefense: The Law Office of Rick Horowitz writes: [...] fond of pointing out that Nazi Germany did not spring fully-armored from the brow of Hitler. [read post]
THE
20 Oct 2011, 10:45 am by CAPTAIN
The PD filed a conflict an PCAC Philip Horowitz was assigned the case. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:03 pm by Rick
” [...]December 13, 2011, Arbitrariness | RHDefense: The Law Office of Rick Horowitz writes: [...] written more than once about the job of a criminal defense attorney. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:42 pm by Rick
CommentsJuly 23, 2011, A Lawyer's Duty of Loyalty | RHDefense: The Law Office of Rick Horowitz writes: [...] comments clearly have an adverse effect on representation of a client, if only of a Casey-Anthony sort. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:13 pm by Rick
Scott Greenfield, with whom I occasionally disagree, but for whom I really do have a great deal of respect, writes a provocative post — I know, I know: you’d like me to tell you something new. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:28 am by Ken
First, Rick Horowitz talks about how eager we are to judge parents — and involve the government — when we conclude, based on limited information, that parents are not doing a good enough job of watching their kids. [read post]
28 May 2011, 6:00 am by George M. Wallace
 That sub-theme was the trigger for several posts, and those posts provide as good a starting point as any for this week's compilation: [Non-defendant] criminal defense attorney Rick Horowitz began his post, "Railing Against Rakofsky," with a statement of his reasons for taking up the subject: I’ve never been a fan of the draft. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:17 pm by Mark Bennett
Internet Week 2 » Rakofsky Against the Internet, Trailer 2 Standing With My Fellow Legal Bloggers Against an Attempt to Chill Speech Rakofsky suing the internet: Career suicide Railing Against Rakofsky | RHDefense: The Law Office of Rick Horowitz Why have not more lawyer bloggers commented on the Rakosfy debacle? [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:53 pm by Jim Calloway
I was reminded of this principle as I read a recent blog post by Rick Horowitz titled The Patch. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 3:31 am by SHG
Depositions with a Doo: Hair Care for Lawyers, by Rick Horowitz and Norm Pattis. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:36 am by Rick
April 1, 2011, Rick writes: @Dee Sepshun No doubt. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:46 am by Rick
I spend a lot of time trying to figure out certain things. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:58 pm by Rick
You say you want an explanation Well, you know… We all want to understand. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm by Editor
Rick Horowitz closed his law office for most of last week. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm by Editor
Rick Horowitz closed his law office for most of last week. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 6:30 am by SHG
   As Rick Horowitz noted in his twit on the subject, it's not "[b]ecause there were no lawyers available. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 1:39 pm by Rick
For me, but not for thee.February 27, 2011, Rick writes: In California, at least, there was a time when the Law -- I'll bow to you on the capitalization, as I agree with the premise; I had stopped actually because I've lost almost all respect for the legal system -- anyway, there was a time when the Law was actually enforced. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 8:30 am by Ed Edmonds
They last lost a hearing against Rick Wilkins in 1996. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
ADVANCE WARNING: To those social media marketers and shiny toy evangelists who check blawg review weekly to see if you are mentioned so you can promote it to death and make lawyers think you have some relevance to the profession, you are not here. [read post]